@touch the sky had yesterday except for a row full explorers was so cool circa 190 Tacken on a beat at Book of Ra 10 winways but against the total 1600 umsatzbedingubg I did not come at the end with what I had bet out again totally mies. So +-0
Ariana wrote on 04.04.2024 at 00:59: @touch the sky had yesterday except for one line full explorers was so cool circa 190 Tacken on a beat at Book of Ra 10 winways but against the total 1600 umsatzbedingubg I did not come at the end with what I had bet out again totally lousy.... So +-0
Sorry, if I had taken a wagerfree bonus, I could have bought a lot of lollies now
The fact that "something forbidden" is not allowed to be advertised is not so funny now, I would think...
If users would share the offers here without banners to click on in a thread, I wouldn't really consider it advertising.
Yes, in theory it's not strange to ban advertising for illegal things, but you have to consider why it's declared as forbidden.
flaschenposter wrote on 03.04.2024 at 23:55:
This may seem like "advertising" to/for some, but it most certainly is not (so I'm at least strongly assuming you're not getting any money for it, with the obligation to "advertise" in return)!
GJ certainly doesn't take any money for it (that's not the point), but it is still advertising. Your attention is drawn to an alternative offer. This alternative offer was declared illegal because you want the players to play in your own booths. Why are the DE booths unattractive, among other things? Not only because you are allowed to play with the handbrake on, but also because you have to pay 5.3% tax per spin. You don't have to in the Curacao booths either and I don't think Platin and Pino have bothered to pass this tax on to the German tax authorities. What for? They would still be illegal.
flaschenposter wrote on 03.04.2024 at 23:55
Germany could regulate/control its BTRX/screen text back then. Or the fax machines in its offices. Or any printed advertisements.
But not the Internet. In case of doubt, a server in a "foreign country" is enough for that
That's exactly what they're trying to do. That it's difficult to implement is another matter, but that's exactly what reminded me of Voss's plan. Why did he campaign so hard for this stupid idea? There was a lobby behind it that wanted to profit from it - just like here.
I didn't even notice that with the no Deposit area at first. But I've seen it now and thought it would happen at some point.
The German license must be defended by all means - not improved so that it is really competitive and attractive for players - currently it is 99% only for the state and the operators - simply sue everything around it away if necessary. The main thing is that we don't have to change anything because change involves work 🤡
If the offer were really fair, the illegal market would take care of itself, but that's another matter.
Regarding the no dep area here, I'll throw a completely irrelevant question into the room that has absolutely nothing to do with the topic....
Did you know that the Opera browser has a built-in free VPN?
I accidentally activated it and saw a completely normal no dep area Ugh... I'd rather switch it off now so that I only see the German offers 😶
This post has been translated automatically
H****e
verified
Forum posts:35The member deleted himself on10.04.2024
Chatterbox
4th Apr. 2024, at 08:11 am CEST#11451
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
I think everyone feels that way, they should do something about the RTP and get rid of the 5 second rule, then more people would play at German online casinos.
Blubbo33 wrote on 03.04.2024 at 23:09: Whoever elects such a government or such parties should not be surprised!
There are several more current examples where something is regulated or banned!
Sure, but that has already been discussed and complained about in detail about 70,000 times😄
Yes, but that's the point. As Toastbrot writes it would be a thousand times better to be more competitive. Instead, the competition is declared illegal.
No kidding, wouldn't you go to a legal OC where you don't have these bullshit rules before a Curacao or Malta OC? I would. Mainly because a legal OC guarantees you a payout and you can be sure that the OC will come up with any stories to avoid having to pay out your wins. But that's just my opinion, maybe you disagree and would play somewhere else despite a legal provider.
Rainmann wrote on 04.04.2024 at 08:20:
Where on the piece of paper is the right place?
Somewhere in the middle of the ballot paper, I would guess
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Sorry, if I had taken a wagerfree bonus, I could have bought a lot of lollies now
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes, in theory it's not strange to ban advertising for illegal things, but you have to consider why it's declared as forbidden.
GJ certainly doesn't take any money for it (that's not the point), but it is still advertising. Your attention is drawn to an alternative offer. This alternative offer was declared illegal because you want the players to play in your own booths. Why are the DE booths unattractive, among other things? Not only because you are allowed to play with the handbrake on, but also because you have to pay 5.3% tax per spin. You don't have to in the Curacao booths either and I don't think Platin and Pino have bothered to pass this tax on to the German tax authorities. What for? They would still be illegal.
That's exactly what they're trying to do. That it's difficult to implement is another matter, but that's exactly what reminded me of Voss's plan. Why did he campaign so hard for this stupid idea? There was a lobby behind it that wanted to profit from it - just like here.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Sure, but this has already been discussed and objected to in detail around 70,000 times😄
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
Hanshanshans
The German license must be defended by all means - not improved so that it is really competitive and attractive for players - currently it is 99% only for the state and the operators - simply sue everything around it away if necessary. The main thing is that we don't have to change anything because change involves work 🤡
If the offer were really fair, the illegal market would take care of itself, but that's another matter.
Regarding the no dep area here, I'll throw a completely irrelevant question into the room that has absolutely nothing to do with the topic....
Did you know that the Opera browser has a built-in free VPN?
I accidentally activated it and saw a completely normal no dep area Ugh... I'd rather switch it off now so that I only see the German offers 😶
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Where on the piece of paper is the right place?
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
Toastbrot
Yes, but that's the point. As Toastbrot writes it would be a thousand times better to be more competitive. Instead, the competition is declared illegal.
No kidding, wouldn't you go to a legal OC where you don't have these bullshit rules before a Curacao or Malta OC? I would. Mainly because a legal OC guarantees you a payout and you can be sure that the OC will come up with any stories to avoid having to pay out your wins. But that's just my opinion, maybe you disagree and would play somewhere else despite a legal provider.
Somewhere in the middle of the ballot paper, I would guess
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
Blubbo33, 
gagapapamama, 
Saphira
This post has been translated automatically