Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Other topics related to... : Indication because of §285 StGB (Page 6)

Topic created on 02nd Apr. 2019 | Page: 6 of 26 | Answers: 253 | Views: 77,025
illmnzi
Rookie
The law on this is anything but wishy-washy. The monopoly lies with the state. And gambling is illegal outside this monopoly. And I think, by the way, that this circumstance is dealt with very laxly here. But I also understand that this community here then loses its foundation.

I wrote today with my school friend, who works in my house bank. And he just told me that the authorities generally put pressure on the banks regarding gambling.

I recommend everyone to withdraw for the time being, what concerns ocs and to wait for a regulation of the federal states.

This post has been translated automatically

WithoutWings
Top Member
The story will be true - the fact is that the banks seem to be taking it more seriously.

I can very well imagine that they also sort out who they would like to keep as customers and xy with little income and always gambling debts or not profitable enough they shit on.

There will certainly be more such cases because the majority will not post it publicly or hang around in forums

And of course it serves as a deterrent for others like me zb;)

This post has been translated automatically

sonne10
Top Member
The bank was to blame, it set the ball rolling 👹If I were you, I would demand to see the files.
I think there is more behind it 🐱🐉

This post has been translated automatically

Unrealmaster32
Rookie
sonne10 wrote on 02.04.2019 at 17:51: The bank was to blame, they started the ball rolling 👹If I were you I'd demand files insight.
I think there is more to it 🐱🐉

I have already had access to the files. In it were among other things my money transactions of all my accounts that I own up to the beginning of 2017

Other criminal nor civil aspects are really not in the room, otherwise I would tell you but also

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
illmnzi wrote on 02/04/2019 17:46: The law on this is anything but wishy washy. The monopoly is with the state. And gambling is illegal outside of that monopoly. And I think, by the way, that this circumstance is dealt with very laxly here. But I also understand that this community here then loses its foundation.

I wrote today with my school friend, who works in my house bank. And he just told me that the authorities generally put pressure on the banks regarding gambling.

I recommend everyone to withdraw for the time being, what concerns ocs and to wait for a regulation of the federal states.

Right. Something to think about:

Would all the chargebacks work if it was all legal?

This post has been translated automatically

sonne10
Top Member
Unrealmaster32 wrote on 04/02/2019 at 5:55 pm
I have already had access to my files. In it were among other things my money transactions of all my accounts I own up to the beginning of 2017

Further criminal nor civil aspects are really not in the room, otherwise I would tell you but also

I would not put up with such a thing, because it is also not prohibited Germany 👹

This post has been translated automatically

Falko
Icon
Why do the banks allow transactions in the casinos (do not block it) and then when you win money back from there it becomes a problem all of a sudden. I do not understand.

This post has been translated automatically

Ichbins2018
Top Member
Banks cancel accounts due to online gambling, players dodge banks to transfer payments to Online Casinos,
Chargeback is currently a hype and lawyers are earning themselves silly because of it.
Players get their money back, the reason illegal gambling is enough!
Payment providers (not a few) -all above PayPal withdraw.
All lawsuits against banks are running...

Also yes, the Threadsteller is not the only one ne complaint at the neck has (there I know just more!)
What is the paragraph 285 StGB - a fantasy?

So, and what I do not understand now, if it is for the Schönreder but all so legal....why then the whole up there in my text?

But perhaps someone still finds itself that can answer a single point meaningfully?

This post has been translated automatically

Ichbins2018
Top Member
Falko wrote on 02.04.2019 at 18:12: Why do the banks allow transactions in the casinos ( do not lock that ) and then when you win money back from there it becomes a problem with once. Don't understand.

Because the banks earn themselves stupidly on it, so at least until now have earned.
And because our state has not managed to stop these illegal transactions, is too stupid (as far as online gambling is concerned) to implement the laws created specifically for this.

This post has been translated automatically

Stromberg
Legend
Ichbins2018 wrote on 04/02/2019 at 18:31: Banks cancel accounts due to online gambling, players dodge banks to transfer payments to Online Casinos,
Chargeback is hype right now and lawyers are earning themselves silly because of it.
Players get their money back, the reason illegal gambling is enough!
Payment providers (not a few) -all above PayPal withdraw.
All lawsuits against banks are running...

Also yes, the Threadsteller is not the only one ne complaint at the neck has (there I know just more!)
What is the paragraph 285 StGB - a fantasy?

So, and what I do not understand now, if it is for the Schönreder but all so legal....why then the whole up there in my text?

But perhaps someone still finds itself that can answer a single point meaningfully?

Makes sense, but quite as clearly as you describe it seems to be but also not, otherwise the only conviction that there was so far but not tilted...

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics18th May. 2024 at 08:11 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately