For me it comes too late, but in the meantime I don't care, I don't plan to play ever again
Then the banks can also stop canceling people's accounts and the state no longer has to check all the nonsense about money laundering that the banks report in the meantime. But until that is decided here will still ruin so many his life 😳
i was wondering whether a €1k limit (if it comes to pass) would not trigger exactly the opposite of what it was intended to achieve?
this artificial scarcity and in the back of the head --> you may not Deposit more than 1000 €, only in case of win (who has it already) and pay out then increases the sum --> lets one or the other perhaps rather fall into a kind of panic and deposits immediately the 1000, bets much higher than his previous preferences to win just higher and to be able to play more and poof you have quite a few new gambling addicts:-(
even the banks will then turn around 180 degrees, because everywhere where something is limited in transactions suddenly everyone wants to have something of the cake, so ala --> pay now through our bank and you get xx cash on top
hahaha, think about it
Whether the one or the other Streamer is already panicking and waiting with packed suitcases until the departure abroad until this 1000 Euro monthly rule comes into force? If the streamers would then only play on 10 or 20 cents so they create the complete month on their channels to load, are certainly very many regular viewers away.
Whether the one or the other Streamer is already panicking
Don't worry because most of them play with Fake-/Casinomoney anyway. However, the robbery pistols that have to be told why you have no problem with the 1000 € limit should be interesting.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Countries want to legalize online gambling
10th Mar. 2020, at 11:47 am CET#47
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Iseedeadpeople wrote on 09.03.2020 at 16:12: wondered if such a € 1k limit (if it comes so) does not trigger exactly the opposite of what it should bezewcken?
this artificial scarcity and in the back of the head --> you may not Deposit more than 1000 €, only in case of win (who has it already) and pay out then increases the sum --> lets the one or the other perhaps rather fall into a kind of panic and deposits immediately the 1000, bets much higher than his previous preferences to win just higher and to be able to play more and poof you have quite a few new gambling addicts:-(
even the banks will then turn around 180 degrees, because everywhere where something is limited in transactions suddenly everyone wants to have something of the cake, so ala --> pay now through our bank and you get xx cash on top
hahaha, think about it
But what I wonder:
You write here about the deposits by bank
But how will it be if you use Neteller, or Paysafecard or credit cards etc.?
I do not think that anyone would have control over the 1000 € maximum amount per month. Neteller, for example, does not know whether I have already deposited by bank 1000 € in various casinos and would certainly not care about it.
This will be a huge bureaucratic effort, which ultimately everyone who wants can somehow circumvent.
Gamer777 wrote on 10.03.2020 at 11:47 am: But what I wonder:You write here of the deposits by bank
But how will it be if you use Neteller, or Paysafecard or credit cards etc.?
I do not think that anyone would have control over the 1000 € maximum amount per month. Neteller, for example, does not know whether I have already deposited by bank 1000 € in various casinos and would certainly not care about it.
This will be a huge bureaucratic effort, which ultimately everyone who wants can somehow circumvent.
i can only quote cristoph from his report: The limit applies across all offers on the Internet. The payment flows are to be monitored centrally by the new gambling authority. Possible wins can be counted towards the limit, so it is actually a net loss limit of 1,000€ (1,000€ is the most a player can lose of his own money online in a month).
there is then probably something in between so that every Deposit and every withdrawal is automatically recorded and assigned to the individual. then it does not matter how you deposit or withdraw. even psc deposits --> full control of the cash flows even
i'm just waiting for them to check the contents of the wallet at the entrance of my real life casino and write it down, lol --> all just my layman's opinion because i have no idea about anything
Of course, this is somewhere a cut in the personal freedom to deal with his money as you want, but from the other side, it is already a significant contribution to the protection against uncontrolled gambling. In any case, no one can then gamble away all his money in one evening on which this person has lost control in one fell swoop.
i have already written it in the comment to the new report,
the 1000.- can still understand, but the max 1.- per spin is an unnecessary interference in the personal preferences of each user? or is that all ok for you?
what comes to mind in addition, then there would be nothing more with the purchase option, looool.
--> one does not prescribe any smoker or alcohol drinker how much he may smoke / drink a day or in what dose.
--> besides, all other countries have the advantage to get even more jackpots, because there are e.g. games --> the higher the stakes
the higher the chance to get the jp etc.
and something else from the report: From the established German gambling companies came mainly praise to the gambling treaty. Jürgen Häfner, for example, is the managing director of Lotto Rhineland-Palatinate. He praised the new State Treaty's pushback against illegal providers in online gambling. He added that the new treaty would also allow the company to expand its own product range and look to the future with confidence.
that's exactly how i imagined it --> it was and is generally never about legalization so that the individual user can play normally and legally --> may <--- sondern immer nur um die erweiterung des eigenen produktangebotes und somit mehr kohle absahnen -->lotto rheinland pfalz here
if I have misinterpreted something correct me and before someone grumbles --> it is not about my way of playing / betting --> it's about each of you / all players.
</--->
There are here in the forum quite a lot of Highroller recognizable by the winning pictures that are used to always play with stakes of over partly far over 1 euro per spin on slots. Would be interesting if even these people write here what purely, whether it is a mockery for them, whether they will then play at all if then deposits are limited to 1000 euros per month and the maximum bet on 1 euro per spin?
Countries want to legalize online gambling
Nobody has liked this post so far
Then the banks can also stop canceling people's accounts and the state no longer has to check all the nonsense about money laundering that the banks report in the meantime. But until that is decided here will still ruin so many his life 😳
This post has been translated automatically
Countries want to legalize online gambling
Nobody has liked this post so far
That is strong that you despite activity here in the forum that manage not to play at all more, after you were also once for a long time a gamer
This post has been translated automatically
Countries want to legalize online gambling
Nobody has liked this post so far
this artificial scarcity and in the back of the head --> you may not Deposit more than 1000 €, only in case of win (who has it already) and pay out then increases the sum --> lets one or the other perhaps rather fall into a kind of panic and deposits immediately the 1000, bets much higher than his previous preferences to win just higher and to be able to play more and poof you have quite a few new gambling addicts:-(
even the banks will then turn around 180 degrees, because everywhere where something is limited in transactions suddenly everyone wants to have something of the cake, so ala --> pay now through our bank and you get xx cash on top
hahaha, think about it
This post has been translated automatically
Countries want to legalize online gambling
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Countries want to legalize online gambling
Nobody has liked this post so far
@Falko:
Don't worry because most of them play with Fake-/Casinomoney anyway. However, the robbery pistols that have to be told why you have no problem with the 1000 € limit should be interesting.
This post has been translated automatically
Countries want to legalize online gambling
Nobody has liked this post so far
But what I wonder:
You write here about the deposits by bank
But how will it be if you use Neteller, or Paysafecard or credit cards etc.?
I do not think that anyone would have control over the 1000 € maximum amount per month. Neteller, for example, does not know whether I have already deposited by bank 1000 € in various casinos and would certainly not care about it.
This will be a huge bureaucratic effort, which ultimately everyone who wants can somehow circumvent.
This post has been translated automatically
Countries want to legalize online gambling
Nobody has liked this post so far
i can only quote cristoph from his report:
The limit applies across all offers on the Internet. The payment flows are to be monitored centrally by the new gambling authority. Possible wins can be counted towards the limit, so it is actually a net loss limit of 1,000€ (1,000€ is the most a player can lose of his own money online in a month).
there is then probably something in between so that every Deposit and every withdrawal is automatically recorded and assigned to the individual. then it does not matter how you deposit or withdraw. even psc deposits --> full control of the cash flows even
i'm just waiting for them to check the contents of the wallet at the entrance of my real life casino and write it down, lol --> all just my layman's opinion because i have no idea about anything
This post has been translated automatically
Countries want to legalize online gambling
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Countries want to legalize online gambling
Liked this post:
sippi
the 1000.- can still understand, but the max 1.- per spin is an unnecessary interference in the personal preferences of each user? or is that all ok for you?
what comes to mind in addition, then there would be nothing more with the purchase option, looool.
--> one does not prescribe any smoker or alcohol drinker how much he may smoke / drink a day or in what dose.
--> besides, all other countries have the advantage to get even more jackpots, because there are e.g. games --> the higher the stakes
the higher the chance to get the jp etc.
and something else from the report:
From the established German gambling companies came mainly praise to the gambling treaty. Jürgen Häfner, for example, is the managing director of Lotto Rhineland-Palatinate. He praised the new State Treaty's pushback against illegal providers in online gambling. He added that the new treaty would also allow the company to expand its own product range and look to the future with confidence.
that's exactly how i imagined it --> it was and is generally never about legalization so that the individual user can play normally and legally --> may <--- sondern immer nur um die erweiterung des eigenen produktangebotes und somit mehr kohle absahnen -->lotto rheinland pfalz here
if I have misinterpreted something correct me and before someone grumbles --> it is not about my way of playing / betting --> it's about each of you / all players.
</--->
This post has been translated automatically
Countries want to legalize online gambling
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically