If it was / is done at Lord Lucky as at Lapalingo, then Immortal, among others, is no longer allowed in the active bonus! At Lapalingo this was explained to me in the chat quite clearly that none of the games may be played which is listed in the rules
Is the call of the games then pointed out that with active bonus the game may not be played ?
When playing these games is technically prevented or pointed out by message that a called game is not allowed ?
Or is it once again your own fault if you have not studied the terms and conditions in detail?
Latino wrote on 29/03/2019 08:49 clock: Is when calling the games because pointed out that with active bonus the game may not be played ?
Is when playing these games technically prevented or pointed out by message that a called game is not allowed ?
Or is it your own fault again if you have not studied the terms and conditions in detail?
I think that "forbidden" games are not displayed at all during active bonus
I myself can only advise against using a VPN.
Don't forget that from the casino's point of view it could be seen as Manipulation, which could lead to complications with the payout at some point in the future.
Royal777 wrote on 03/28/2019 6:56 PM
So we are still playing at Lapalingo. Actually every week. Because of our lottery there was LordLucky more often. In addition, there were many streams at Leo,Winfest,Fairplay,Multilotto....
Lapalingo and Lurdlucky are basically the same.
.
So in our stream there is no command to VPN. It is not allowed everywhere and it would lead to irritation if we "advertise" or explain it in a command
It is in my eyes a good casino for beginners, because all games are listed in the categories high variance/low Variance etc
Who plays games with high variance and does not get a decent win after 10,000 spins, will not open a "hate thread" here in the forum. After all, he is aware that he has played a game with high variance.
An advanced casino is probably Multilotto. A normal registration on the internet presence of MultiLotto would lead to the fact that you can not play slots. In addition, casinos like Spinia, whose games you can not play at all due to popular Deposit methods (Paysafecard,Bank Transfer). In addition, bonus conditions and other terms and conditions are not clearly listed.
LordLucky used to have a Curacao license and now an MGA license. Therefore, it can be considered as a "newcomer" casino by all means.
Just a little clarification
In Spinia you can play ANY games, it doesn't matter what deposit method you use
Are casino reviews no longer checked? The latest review from "zockerotto" is clearly fake. Newly registered and the only action was to praise this newly listed casino over both ears
Should but already real reviews flow in, otherwise the section has but his. Sense missed.
Theone87 wrote on 29/03/2019 at 21:24: Don't they check casino reviews anymore? The latest review from "zockerotto" is clearly fake after all. Newly signed up and the only action was to praise this newly listed casino over both ears
Should but already real reviews flow in, otherwise the section has but his. Sense missed.
Lol and then he also writes that the fair bonus offers make. With Deposit + bonus together 35 times each convert and take out heaps of games where bonus conversion is not allowed, that's far from fair.
Should but already real reviews flow in, otherwise the section has but his. Sinn verfehlt.
Unfortunately, checking whether a rating is real or not is very difficult to handle. To check each rating costs time that would be better invested elsewhere. If a rating is (falsely) deleted, the censorship accusation is in the room or the suspicion of influence of the operator to prefer / disadvantage certain casinos.
For ratings, a smoothed average would be more suitable. In a smoothing, for example, the best and worst 10% are taken from the rating to filter out good fake reviews or on the other hand bad frustration reviews or at least cushion. Disadvantage: It must already be more than a handful of ratings...
Lol and then he also writes that they make fair bonus offers. With Deposit + bonus together 35 times each convert and heaps of games take out where bonus conversion is not allowed, that's far from fair.
But is the highly praised Casinoclub also so?
Before you can withdraw the bonus from your account, the bonus and deposit must be wagered 40x.
Lord Lucky - the new casino on GambleJoe
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Lord Lucky - the new casino on GambleJoe
Nobody has liked this post so far
When playing these games is technically prevented or pointed out by message that a called game is not allowed ?
Or is it once again your own fault if you have not studied the terms and conditions in detail?
This post has been translated automatically
Lord Lucky - the new casino on GambleJoe
Nobody has liked this post so far
I think that "forbidden" games are not displayed at all during active bonus
This post has been translated automatically
Lord Lucky - the new casino on GambleJoe
Liked this post:
Desruptor
Don't forget that from the casino's point of view it could be seen as Manipulation, which could lead to complications with the payout at some point in the future.
This post has been translated automatically
Lord Lucky - the new casino on GambleJoe
Nobody has liked this post so far
Just a little clarification
In Spinia you can play ANY games, it doesn't matter what deposit method you use
This post has been translated automatically
Lord Lucky - the new casino on GambleJoe
Liked this post:
Falko
Should but already real reviews flow in, otherwise the section has but his. Sense missed.
This post has been translated automatically
Lord Lucky - the new casino on GambleJoe
Nobody has liked this post so far
Lol and then he also writes that the fair bonus offers make. With Deposit + bonus together 35 times each convert and take out heaps of games where bonus conversion is not allowed, that's far from fair.
This post has been translated automatically
Lord Lucky - the new casino on GambleJoe
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Lord Lucky - the new casino on GambleJoe
Nobody has liked this post so far
Unfortunately, checking whether a rating is real or not is very difficult to handle. To check each rating costs time that would be better invested elsewhere. If a rating is (falsely) deleted, the censorship accusation is in the room or the suspicion of influence of the operator to prefer / disadvantage certain casinos.
For ratings, a smoothed average would be more suitable. In a smoothing, for example, the best and worst 10% are taken from the rating to filter out good fake reviews or on the other hand bad frustration reviews or at least cushion. Disadvantage: It must already be more than a handful of ratings...
This post has been translated automatically
Lord Lucky - the new casino on GambleJoe
Nobody has liked this post so far
But is the highly praised Casinoclub also so?
So quasi 80 x ...
What is the lol.
This post has been translated automatically