Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Is there evidence of fraud in online casinos? (Page 35)

Topic created on 01st Jun. 2018 | Page: 35 of 58 | Answers: 573 | Views: 142,981
Anonym
Ok, the Upsola, has already right that that is off topic with the game stores. But if there is already so gross shit, you can add up 1 and 1 what goes on online. And there are no law enforcement agencies that should be interested. It would have to be Europol that could take action here.
The Maltese will hardly shit themselves into their own nest. Because the whole island lives only from half-silly business.

This post has been translated automatically

derzweifel
Experienced
In the gaming arcades, however, it is not Gauselmann who manipulates the chips - it is Klaus A. and Abdul B., who at some point thought about opening an arcade and whose buddy Stefan C. then said he knew someone who could make the machines earn more. This is only possible because they have physical access to the machines, which is not the case online because the "machine" always remains with the manufacturer

This is a significant difference, because here in the thread, large providers such as PlayNGo, NetEnt etc are basically accused of gang fraud (which in my opinion is absurd) and these are the Gauselmänner of the online scene, not small lights who want to squeeze out a few more euros to buy the Mercedes as AMG.

Of course, then no longer supports its own argumentation if you look at it in more detail.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
If the doubt times more exactly reads above, then the Wikipedia article acts however from Mr. Sauselmann and its chain even. I can tell you only one thing: in Stuttgart and probably also in the whole of BW there was a larger chain of arcades called Lauser. The halls were taken over by ADP Merkur/Gauselmann. Since that is in such a way, one wins there over long distances nothing more or pittance. And your "Abduls" are such "little lights" that they can roar around in the fattest luxury cars and collect 2 million. The Stuttgart "tuner" with his 4 halls (see article STN)......I think you would unbuckle if you had seen his real sales times. Small light is probably not the right expression.

Talk to people in everyday life about PlaynGo and Book of Dead. You will often hear the word total fraud. My question to you: Who really controls independently what Netent, PlaynGo and the like are doing?

This post has been translated automatically

derzweifel
Experienced
moosgruber wrote on 19.08.2020 at 17:41: If the doubt times reads more closely above, then the Wikipedia article is about Mr. Sauselmann and his chain itself. I can only tell you one thing: in Stuttgart and probably all of BW there was a larger chain of arcades called Lauser. The halls were taken over by ADP Merkur/Gauselmann. Since that is in such a way, one wins there over long distances nothing more or pittance. And your "Abduls" are so "little lights" that they can roar around with the fattest luxury cars and get 2 million collected. The Stuttgart "tuner" with his 4 halls (see article STN)......I think you would unbuckle if you had seen his real sales times. Small light is probably not the right expression.

Talk to people in everyday life about PlaynGo and Book of Dead. You will often hear the word total fraud. My question to you: Who really controls independently what Netent, PlaynGo and the like are doing?

In the Wikipedia article it says that no evidence of Manipulation by Gauselmann was found and the case was therefore dropped

I never questioned the fact that you can make a few million by running and manipulating arcades (you can probably make them without manipulation, it just takes longer) and I find it pointless to ask people about Book of Dead - there are more losers than winners in gambling, especially in high Variance games. Some of the losers tend to cite cheating as the only possible explanation for the losses - how much relevance one attaches to this explanation is something everyone has to decide for themselves

This post has been translated automatically

derzweifel
Experienced
Anonym

derzweifel wrote on 19.08.2020 at 18:09
In the Wikipedia article it says that no evidence of Manipulation by Gauselmann was found and the case was therefore dropped

I never questioned that you can make a few million by running and manipulating arcades (you can probably make them without manipulation, it just takes longer) and asking people about Book of Dead is pointless to me - there are more losers than winners in gambling, especially in high Variance games. Some of the losers tend to cite cheating as the only possible explanation for the losses - how much relevance one attaches to this explanation is something everyone has to decide for themselves

Three guesses why this was stopped. Take a look at the influence on politics. Just go for 1 month every day in ne Merkur Spielothek. On the Internet, someone who has done this writes that he has lost 300 euros on average every day there. The few visits there were enough for me to know what kind of chances I have there.

This post has been translated automatically

Tostie91
Amateur
derzweifel wrote on 19.08.2020 at 18:09
In the Wikipedia article it says that no evidence of Manipulation by Gauselmann was found and the case was therefore dropped

I never questioned that you can make a few million by running and manipulating arcades (you can probably make them without manipulation, it just takes longer) and asking people about Book of Dead is pointless to me - there are more losers than winners in gambling, especially in high Variance games. Some of the losers tend to cite cheating as the only possible explanation for the losses - how much relevance one attaches to this explanation is something everyone has to decide for themselves

100% agreement!

This post has been translated automatically

Kleinkariert
Expert
moosgruber wrote on 08/19/2020 at 8:03 pm

Three guesses why this was discontinued. Read through the influence on politics. Just go for 1 month every day in ne Merkur Spielothek. On the Internet writes one who has done that, that he has lost every day there 300 Eur on average. The few visits there were enough for me to know what kind of chances I have there.

Where is the influence of politics? Can you give a few sources and not always refer to something that you have to find yourself?

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Why do you still play if everything is always cheating. If it were so why did I already 3x the wildline. Sure because I work for the casino. House advantage and probability is called. No fraud. Rtp regulates everything alone without having to cheat

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Legend
Kleinkariert wrote on 08/19/2020 at 21:45
Where is the influence of politics? Can you give some sources and not always refer to something you have to find yourself?

So that for Gauselmann and Co often from one direction of the policy laws were overturned is no secret there I have even read an interesting article a few years ago and quite nasty tongues claim it has what with the generous party donations zutun but such a thing was of course none of those want to aim

Seriously I always understand when you ask for sources to support a statement but for this topic it really needs no sources but only open eyes in all directions that is so obvious that I already with 17 where I was not allowed to gamble and knew almost nothing of the matter could stand very clear and could never say that ran without something behind the scenes from

Responsible persons of Gauselmann and even Paul Gauselmann himself have let themselves be photographed so often with politicians of the FDP and strangely enough the FDP was more present at the time where all this took place than today that's all no secret

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics15th May. 2024 at 02:10 am CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately