-
MisterL, yesterday at 11:36 pm CEST
-
upola, on 30th Apr. 2024 at 08:14 am CEST
-
Bluff, today at 08:58 am CEST
-
Rasmik12, today at 08:31 am CEST
-
Dagmarlena, today at 07:32 am CEST
-
TranceBabe, today at 12:42 am CEST
-
Enride87, today at 12:06 am CEST
-
MisterL, yesterday at 11:52 pm CEST
-
MisterL, yesterday at 11:44 pm CEST
-
Langhans, yesterday at 07:49 pm CEST
-
garfield68, yesterday at 07:26 pm CEST
-
Butterbrezel, yesterday at 06:46 pm CEST
-
H****2, yesterday at 06:11 pm CEST
-
Terrodrag444, yesterday at 05:05 pm CEST
-
frapi07, yesterday at 02:47 pm CEST
-
nightforce1979, yesterday at 01:35 pm CEST
-
Lizzy0805, yesterday at 09:33 am CEST
-
Masterboerner97, yesterday at 08:34 am CEST
-
roccoammo11, on 12th May. 2024 at 11:36 pm CEST
-
Maja80, on 12th May. 2024 at 09:12 pm CEST
-
H****2, on 12th May. 2024 at 09:12 pm CEST
-
roccoammo11, on 12th May. 2024 at 06:25 pm CEST
-
Max_Bet, on 12th May. 2024 at 08:10 am CEST
-
roccoammo11, on 11th May. 2024 at 11:42 am CEST
-
Rasmik12, on 11th May. 2024 at 09:32 am CEST
-
gamble1, on 11th May. 2024 at 09:05 am CEST
IP - Blocking starts on Friday also for affiliates
Liked this post: NoSkill_NoKill, WhatAboutTism
This post has been translated automatically
IP - Blocking starts on Friday also for affiliates
Nobody has liked this post so far
MuchBetter goes with me Giropay quite normal.
This post has been translated automatically
IP - Blocking starts on Friday also for affiliates
Liked this post: gagapapamama, NoSkill_NoKill
I have spoken clearly on the subject of dictatorship. Of course one can live in Germany self-determined. It's more about the question of why the state comes up with a law to enact what ostensibly serves the "player protection" and thus ultimately only tries to protect its own monopoly. The EU has issued guidelines on this matter.
Excerpt (2016/C 262/01) "187. If a measure granted by the state is likely to improve the competitive position of the recipient vis-à-vis its competitors, it is deemed to distort or threaten to distort competition ( 270 ). In practice, therefore, a distortion of competition within the meaning of Article 107(1) TFEU is generally established when the State grants a financial advantage to an undertaking in a liberalized sector of the economy in which competition exists or is likely to exist ( 271 )."
What (by the way, on the whole platform here) has always liked to be considered a "gray area" as described has never been one. Gambling was de jure always prohibited which does not change the fact that the state has found suitable ways not only to "channel" the market (under duress of course) but as in many other cases immediately holds open the hand to rip off the players. The basic tenor could also be: Here, you can lose 1000€, pay the taxes in disguise, be happy about 87% RTP, then lie down again and give a rest
Our neighbors in Switzerland and the Netherlands show how something like this is actually done effectively and not like what is propagated here without sense and reason. The Player protection does such a procedure not in the approach take into account because I can go here also into the next Lotto acceptance place and buy times evenly for 2000€ or more bills and chase my money into the chimney. There the state makes nothing against? Strange or? Just as strange as the new idea to allow lottery acceptance now also in restaurants. Then you can get drunk in peace and uninhibitedly blow your money and imperceptibly pay double taxes
I recommend people like you who like to trumpet in the forest a little more to differentiate because that is missing here almost completely. The approach player protection should exist in all cases, just not in a way like our nanny state chews down but in personal responsibility!
If I think that I have a problem with gambling, I want to find appropriate tools in all OC that support me to limit the losses. This is the right way because conversely, if this problem does not exist from my point of view, I want to play as it suits myself if I think I want to play that way.
In conclusion, I don't give a damn what is "forbidden". Online gambling has always been prohibited before. Nobody cared about that, right? So now go ahead and produce your "legally compliant" rant
This post has been translated automatically
IP - Blocking starts on Friday also for affiliates
Nobody has liked this post so far
Then it was probably just a short problem thanks for the feedback
This post has been translated automatically
IP - Blocking starts on Friday also for affiliates
Nobody has liked this post so far
Would it make sense/safe to Deposit anything at PinoCasino (MGA license) today or would that be "giving away money"? What happens in the worst case?
This post has been translated automatically
IP - Blocking starts on Friday also for affiliates
Liked this post: Anonym
In the worst case you have to write the support a mail that you no longer come to the site and your balance should be paid out
Even if an IP block comes that will certainly not affect all providers immediately, especially since Pinocasino pays the tax and also offers some games with 1 € max and 5 seconds rule think they are then rather the last to go
This post has been translated automatically
IP - Blocking starts on Friday also for affiliates
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
IP - Blocking starts on Friday also for affiliates
Liked this post: Anonym
Works for me.
This post has been translated automatically
IP - Blocking starts on Friday also for affiliates
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
IP - Blocking starts on Friday also for affiliates
Nobody has liked this post so far
I come on Beemcasino on it even if I have never gambled there
This post has been translated automatically