Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Public complaints: Live Roulette Test Method "Martingale (Page 5)

Topic created on 18th Mar. 2018 | Page: 5 of 15 | Answers: 145 | Views: 29,034
Anonym
Champion280667 wrote on 19/03/2018 at 14:01: The finance professor only examines the question: Manipulation yes or no.
This is not about what tricks can I rebuild with this scam.

I make you the case for illustration very simple: on day X you say to yourself, today I bet only on red. Exactly from the Monent when you log in comes constantly only black. And this with every login in a row. You make a video recording, because you almost can't believe it, and show it to your regulars in the evening.

They reply, yes, this is all normal. You would probably also say, are you all crazy now. I believe in coincidence, but somewhere it stops with the coincidences, especially if they result only in the own loss.

Many ask themselves, why should they do that. They want your money, simple as that. Moreover, they are protected by corrupt authorities. Malta has other stories that go into the same theme. So why is the biggest gambling regulator in Malta?

Alright then, I'll try it another way. This is a live Roulette table, a LIVE ROULETTE TABLE! Not only you play on it, but hundreds or even thousands of others. This ( manipulation ) as described by you, works only with a single person. As soon as 2 players are at the table this does not work at all. So why should you let hundreds of players win but only you lose as a single person?

Please explain this to me once

This post has been translated automatically

s****e
For Hammerdammer casinos are all dear, and everything is pure coincidence!
Fraud in Hammerdammer's life? Never ever!
He thinks along the lines of what you would expect from a citizen
Expected from a citizen.

This post has been translated automatically

C****7
Well to me many years ago a groupier on the latrine way confirmed that the Martingale strategy works.
I wanted to know this effectively, paid 150 euros and unfortunately received 100 euros bonus.
So I started with 250 Euro and earned 7'600 Euro with this strategy. For me, the proof that it works.

Now the gentlemen had a problem with me. My IP address was registered in the software as "Black Sheep"
and wherever I played I noticed these interferences or manipulations.
This was confirmed to me, when I once played at a completely different address with a new login and I did not notice any manipulation
and I did not notice any manipulation. An average Roulette player always leaves money because he gets too greedy and takes too big a risk.
With time, however, even VPN shifted IP addresses are of no use.

Strategy players are the enemies of game providers. You have to get on this list first, so that you would effectively see results in the
Game.
Imagine I would have continued to play my strategy with the 7'600.- Euro balance and gained in the same 1000% range.
I think I would have broken the bank. That's why in many roulettes the stakes were lowered to max. 5 to 10 Euro
pushed down

So the explanation why it is not applied to all is: The software of the providers do not have the problem with
Players who clear once, but with those who continuously increase their balance. That is why they are prioritized
players, they are "fought" with priority.
I know many users who wrote me that in the beginning they had success with their own strategy and suddenly they only lost
lost. This is not random, but has a system.
Do you understand my answer?


This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Champion280667 wrote on 19/03/2018 at 19:08: Well to me many years ago a groupier on the latrine way confirmed that the Martingale strategy works.
This I wanted to know effectively, deposited 150 euros and unfortunately drew 100 euros bonus.
So I started with 250 Euro and earned 7'600 Euro with this strategy. For me, the proof that it works.





Well, first of all, you don't write Groupier, and secondly, I think that's complete nonsense.

No Croupier will ever give such a stupid message from himself. And why should he still be a croupier if he has found a 100% safe strategy?


Roulette is mathematically unbeatable. In the long run the casino always wins. There is NO strategy that could override the bank advantage.

That in Online Casinos not everything happens with right things, I'm not even so averse to the thought and you can discuss it gladly.

But please do not discredit yourself with such invented statements, because you will hardly be taken seriously.

This post has been translated automatically

C****7
Thank you Random! Thanks for the roses, unfortunately I can prove everything. Nothing is invented.
Do you earn wages from this industry?

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Champion280667 wrote on 03/19/2018 at 7:36 pm: Thanks Random! Thanks for the roses, unfortunately I can back it all up. Nothing is made up.
Are you drawing wages from this industry?



Can you read?

I am referring to your statement about the croupier.

If you want to prove something here, then do it. But if you come up with such obviously invented statements, how can anyone take you seriously.

I also think for a long time that in online casino so many things are not true and I would break out in cries of joy if finally someone comes along and could really prove it.
But what you deliver are unfortunately no evidence. It is circumstantial evidence. And all that remains is a bad queasy feeling and the impression that something is wrong. Probably justified. But it is nothing that would hold up in a court of law. Therefore, it is not evidence.

And if you then still come with invented statements around the corner, because you think we all stand there with open mouths and think: Boah, a Croupier has said that, so it must be true, then it is also ridiculous.
And that would be a real pity, because then you never get to the point how you could actually prove something like that, but such a discussion is then again led in two camps until it degenerates until the thread is closed - is already so since there is Internet and online casino forums.
And this thread is exactly in this category.

It would be nice to lead such a discussion really times in such a way that one comes at the end to a clear conclusion. Either you can prove that cheating is going on or you come to the conclusion that everything is subjective. Or you come to the conclusion that probably cheating is the casinos but make it so clever that you can not prove it.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
stkrie wrote on 19/03/2018 at 19:00: At Hammerdammer namely casinos are all dear, and everything pure coincidence!
Fraud in Hammerdammer's life? Never ever!
He thinks nicely in the track, as you would expect from a
Expected from a citizen.

Straw man, I never claimed that cheating never happens in casinos. In this case it is simply laughable

But strkie can not read. strkie must be nice and good to fire out straw man arguments as expected of a troll

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Champion280667 wrote on 03/19/2018 at 7:36 pm: Thanks Random! Thanks for the roses, unfortunately I can back it all up. Nothing is made up.
Are you drawing wages from this industry?

With me unfortunately hatte also nothing more explained?

It's a pity that you don't answer essential questions. I mean already clear, logically you can not answer this but ignore is also not the fine way


This post has been translated automatically

C****7
Do you want the letter from the professor of financial law, sign's lawyer of a class action law firm, who confirms that here is cheating? He has seen the first films with screenshots, which I have posted here, and his judgment is unequivocal.
What proof would be unequivocal for you?


This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Champion280667 wrote on 19/03/2018 at 20:08: Do you want the letter from the professor of financial law, Zeichens lawyer of a class action law firm, who confirms that here is cheating? He has seen the first movies with screenshots, which I have posted here, and his judgment is unequivocal.
What proof would be unequivocal for you?

I don't want to see a letter from an ominous professor who doesn't understand the principle of a Roulette table with more than one player

I would like you to please answer me why a casino in a live roulette table should let one player lose and others win Thank you!

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics18th May. 2024 at 08:10 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately