Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Public complaints: Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void (Page 3)

Topic created on 11th Jul. 2018 | Page: 3 of 16 | Answers: 155 | Views: 46,096
Knochen
Elite

Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void

11th Jul. 2018, at 04:17 pm CEST#21
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes, of course, this is somewhere cheating. But still, the player has 100% always played with the money of the casino. If they say you can pay out a maximum of 100 € then you can pay out a maximum of 100 €. I think the casino may set rules for the registration bonus as it wants. Even if these are somewhat misleading. After all, no one has lost their money.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void

11th Jul. 2018, at 04:34 pm CEST#22
1 Like

Liked this post: Avatar von Skitch22 Skitch22
Bone wrote on 11.07.2018 at 16:17: Yes of course this is somewhere cheating. But still the player has 100% always played with the money of the casino. If they say you can withdraw a maximum of 100€ then you can withdraw a maximum of 100€. I think the casino may set rules for the registration bonus as it wants. Even if these are somewhat misleading. After all, no one has lost their money.

I see this rather so that is said:" ok here 10 euros for you with but you can withdraw a maximum of 100 euros. Everything that is won over it is forfeited". And that is perfectly ok for a no Deposit bonus.

But if I have the 100 euros free and the money is mine, which suggests the real money display, I should be able to do what I want with it.

Whether I now pay out 100 euros and 100 euros again and thus win 7000 euros, makes no difference from the logic.

This post has been translated automatically

Skitch22
Elite

Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void

11th Jul. 2018, at 04:41 pm CEST#23
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Zockertyp89 wrote on 11/07/2018 at 16:34
I see this rather so that is said:" ok here 10 euros for you with but you can withdraw a maximum of 100 euros. Everything that is won above that will be forfeited". And that is perfectly ok for a no Deposit bonus.

But if I have the 100 euros free and the money is mine, which suggests the real money display, I should be able to do what I want with it.

Whether I now pay out 100 euros and 100 euros again and thus win 7000 euros, makes no difference from the logic.

That's right, so this rule is really nonsense.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void

11th Jul. 2018, at 04:52 pm CEST#24
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Bone wrote on 11.07.2018 at 16:17: Yes of course this is somewhere cheating. But still the player has 100% always played with the money of the casino. If they say you can withdraw a maximum of 100€ then you can withdraw a maximum of 100€. I think the casino may set rules for the registration bonus as it wants. Even if these are somewhat misleading. After all, no one has lost their money.

In principle, I agree with you.
Nevertheless, the hundred euros have lost nothing on the real money display.

Let's assume I play the 100€ free, pay in additional amount X and continue playing. With the 100€+X I win amount Y. Did I play with bonus or real money? The casino will of course claim "sorry, no payout because bonus in play"

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void

11th Jul. 2018, at 06:24 pm CEST#25
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Bone wrote on 11.07.2018 at 15:35: Wrong, the casino does not claim it would be Bonus money but only that the Max. Cashout is 100€. So you can also 500000000€ Winning, more than 100€ goes just nothing. And that would be a huge mess, with a no Deposit bonus I find it justifiable. It's free money and you also have to see the company as a company. They have this promotion and they have to manage with it. I do not want to know how many registrations at Lapalingo have played only these 10 € and then never deposited, including me and certainly some others here in this forum.

Had the whole thing happened when converting a normal Deposit bonus I would see it differently. But free money to try out the casino is I think not necessarily something to which you are always 100% entitled and I can understand that without a deposit of the player simply the withdrawal amount is capped. This is also not a scam.


The player has already converted this gift amount and period.
The max cashout is 100 and exactly this was credited to the player as real money.
This is clearly cheated what the stuff holds is obvious.
Either there is this regulation because the system runs better because it still runs on bonus or why ever.
Malicious deception, not unethical business practices.

I would argue to have you banned, because you are probably the biggest troll here of all.
Even with the clear fraud you still defend the casinos as if you were involved with them. If that is not the case then option B can only be that you are a super troll who is having fun with cheated players.
I don't know if this should be tolerated here any longer.

You are twisting the facts. Alone that you talk about a no deposit bonus.
That is no longer relevant here, because the player is shown the balance as real money and he has already waived 200, with which the player has absolutely no problem.
Any reasonable court would find the casino guilty of fraud due to such business methods.
Canst then yes appear there as a lawyer for the casino.
They will not find a more dogged defender.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void

11th Jul. 2018, at 06:37 pm CEST#26
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Random wrote on 11/07/2018 at 18:24
The player has already wagered this gift amount and period.
The max cashout is 100 and exactly this was also credited to the player as real money.
That is clearly cheated here what the stuff holds is obvious.
Either there is this rule because the system runs better because it still runs on bonus or why ever.
Malicious deception, not unethical business practices.

I would argue to have you banned, because you are probably the biggest troll here of all.
Even with the clear fraud you still defend the casinos as if you were involved with them. If that is not the case then option B can only be that you are a super troll who is having fun with cheated players.
I don't know if this should be tolerated here any longer.

You are twisting the facts. Alone that you talk about a no Deposit bonus.
That is no longer relevant here, because the player is shown the balance as real money and he has already waived 200, with which the player has absolutely no problem.
Any reasonable court would find the casino guilty of fraud due to such business methods.
Canst then yes appear there as a lawyer for the casino.
They will not find a more dogged defender.

So true in this case it is 100% fraud..there are also this time no different opinions even if some certainly like to discuss again..eg bones, but for me it was always clear that most statements is not normal common sense but only deliberate provocation.

This post has been translated automatically

Knochen
Elite

Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void

11th Jul. 2018, at 06:43 pm CEST#27
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
What has the player been cheated out of now? For the 0€ that he deposited? If you go for a bonus you should know the rules. And yes, I am certainly a troll. All who do not think like you have one on the waffle.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void

11th Jul. 2018, at 06:53 pm CEST#28
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Knochen wrote on 11.07.2018 at 18:43: What was the player cheated now? For the 0€ he deposited? If you go for a bonus you should know the rules. And yes, I am a troll for sure. All those who don't think like you have one up on you.

If the rules are clearly defined correct, but that is not the case here 😉

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void

11th Jul. 2018, at 06:54 pm CEST#29
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Knochen wrote on 11.07.2018 at 18:43: What was the player cheated now? For the 0€ he deposited? If you go for a bonus you should know the rules. And yes, I am a troll for sure. All those who don't think like you have one up on you.

The offer is 10 euros no deposit. Maximum win through the no Deposit bonus 100 euros after implementing the bonus conditions.

This is what happened. The quite legitimate question is, why do I have to withdraw first and then deposit again to be allowed to win? I may lose with my 100 euros that I have won fairly. But why not win more?

If Lapalingo so insists, should be paid in such a case the 100 euros automatically to the player.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void

11th Jul. 2018, at 06:54 pm CEST#30
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Schorsch wrote on 11/07/2018 at 18:53
If the rules are clearly defined correct, But that is not the case here 😉

Yes they are. See page 1.

The question of meaning is there.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics19th May. 2024 at 10:49 am CEST

Miscellaneous
0
World
0
Sports betting
0
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.
© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com
✕

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately