Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Public complaints: Betsson has blocked account because I apparently blocked the account at sister casino (Page 2)

Topic created on 21st Aug. 2018 | Page: 2 of 3 | Answers: 29 | Views: 9,264
VM292
Amateur
stkrie wrote on 08/21/2018 at 23:05: Well, there's nothing wrong with checking new threads for inconsistencies first
to search for inconsistencies. After all, there are enough negative examples here like the one
e.g. tonight. You write a long post to help, and when you send it, the TE has already deleted himself
the TE has already deleted. That is at least as annoying. And since that was here lately also often the case,
you should approach a new thread with due skepticism. If he is conclusive, everything is ok.

Especially since she really did not offend, but only wrote her opinion about it, and also apologized
for these doubts also still apologized.
And before the TE was still given helpful tips.
Think everyone can live with it, right?

If I but from the outset in any way have doubts that in the thread or the new user what can not be right, why do I have to write something about it?

I mean, on the one hand, people get upset that you write well-intentioned answers, which took so much time, on threads like the one tonight. But a long post where the thread is taken apart, even recalculated whether years can be correct, that was not a waste of time?

And apart from that... what was not credible in the "story" now?

by the way, I didn't mention anything about her being insulting now...

This post has been translated automatically

s****e
With it you quote now however other forum members, who compared actually the jahreszahlen
compared
I agree with you. but they were still not deterred from typing!

i think this is due to the basic mistrust here, that some have been banned,
evt have created a new account

do not think that this goes against the new users in and of itself.
that is what i said at the time. due to the multiple accounts of laboy or even
hammerdammer has created a lot of uncertainty here

against it measures were announced, then one heard nothing more from.

think that would greatly increase the acceptance for new users.

but this is now a completely new topic, so i will end my writing here now
writing here now.


This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Daniel wrote on 08/21/2018 at 8:56 pm
Can you possibly explain to me why you have doubts about the authenticity of his story?

First of all... I probably wrote much more than that I doubt it and even my doubts were put in the background... from there you would also have to explain to me why I am nailed on it?

Nevertheless I try to explain myself here gladly...

I don't know if you have been informed about certain events in your absence, but it seems to have become a popular sport to register here and report bogus problems.

I and other users have made the effort in the past to provide the affected TE with advice, but these efforts were often trampled underfoot.

Have become a little more skeptical due to multiple disappointments in this regard, which I think is a normal reaction.

Tochthesky...

Too bad that despite the well-intentioned sentences you only read out the less good, which was even put into perspective by me.

The glass is not always half empty, can also be half full.

VM92...

The same above applies to you.... what have you contributed helpful now please? Do you think he gets his money now because you completely agree with him and shoot pointlessly against me? This "constantly" is also completely out of place, because the reality is different.

This post has been translated automatically

Azura
Rookie
Betsson responded to my call back request today. The woman was very polite and apologized that my account was simply closed without warning. According to her, the account could possibly be reopened if I take back the PayPal warnings.

What exactly happens with the deposited contributions I will apparently learn tomorrow by mail

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend
What is a PayPal warning?

This post has been translated automatically

Azura
Rookie
I have warned Betsson via Pay Pal

This post has been translated automatically

s****e
That's a great idea. did not know that goes.
why take back, that casino has behaved badly^^

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Fortuna-III wrote on 08/22/2018 at 21:41: Betsson responded to my callback request today. The woman was very polite and apologized that my account was just closed without warning. According to her, the account could possibly be reopened if I take back the PayPal warnings.

What exactly happens with the deposited contributions I learn apparently tomorrow by mail

How about: You take back the warning as soon as everything is clarified?

But did not know that such a thing goes. How do you do that ?

This post has been translated automatically

T0uchTheSky
Elite
With PayPal there is nevertheless this buyer protection, if a Dealer makes trouble and/or commodity does not supply, one can announce with Paypal the problem, in this case is the casino the dealer...

This post has been translated automatically

Stealth
Rookie
As far as I know, electronic goods and services are excluded from buyer protection.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics16th May. 2024 at 08:43 am CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately