Begbie wrote on 09.12.2020 at 19:16: In programming there is a primitive randomness, which provides a supposedly random result, but nevertheless always follows a certain "scheme". If one would put this primitive coincidence into the slots, the casinos would be broke long ago, since it would be possible to see through the "scheme" sooner or later.
But you can feed the programmed randomness with additional parameters to create deeply nested coincidences. Just like the slots do. Here, of course, it is not completely impossible that the same result is drawn several times in a row, but it is much less likely.
Now you don't have to make a science out of it and program for hours. Other smart people have already done that and offer it for download. But GJ has tunnel vision and insists on his one man coder show.
It's not called primitive in programming, but it's true that there is no real chance in programming. The scheme you name is an algorithm and it can be complex or less complex. Including more factors is always possible but rarely really necessary, the distribution will work very well even with a few factors.
I wrote a draw tool myself and tested it, after about 500.000 runs the distribution was already very good. There were only a few deviations. After a few million it would have been "fairly" distributed and I only used the standard RNG command which some programming languages already offer from the house. So these already serve their purpose very well and have a good algorithm.
But what I am missing in your claim is the proof, if you can statically prove that the lottery is outside its range then is justified. And yes you can calculate the distribution in the statistics and to what degree it is still coherent.
No statistical proof is needed at all. The results speak for themselves. And that's after just a few runs. Just like last year, it's just very obvious. Overall, it makes the lottery not quite fair. Therefore there should be imho the installation of a "fairness correction". Wins are locked for the following day offers itself there naturally.
And just like last year I just say there, hopefully they remove you completely from the lottery Begbie.
I've never seen so much ingratitude as here in this forum, there is no forum that makes sone lotteries and yet it always knows some people do not appreciate
Simply sad and that although supposedly the feast of love is approaching.
Begbie wrote on 09.12.2020 at 21:13: No statistical proof is needed at all. The results speak for themselves. And that's already after so few runs. Just like last year, it's just very obvious. Overall, it makes the lottery not quite fair. Therefore there should be imho the installation of a "fairness correction". Wins are locked for the following day offers itself there naturally.
you argue with: "mir hupe ob ich win", "the system prefers names" and what I know for bullshit.
if you did not care, you would not write anything about it
if the system would prefer names the same would win as last year
haven't won yet, see me crying? you're just making a fool of yourself
robby811 wrote on 09.12.2020 at 22:31: I won last year and not yet this year that can't be a coincidence
But that's also just, dear robby, because you haven't yet sufficiently appreciated that extremely cute (nohomo) Christmas hat above the G at GambleJoe in the upper left corner
😎
But now without nonsense, I celebrate that somehow extremely haha 😂
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Liked this post:
Counter, S****i
It's not called primitive in programming, but it's true that there is no real chance in programming. The scheme you name is an algorithm and it can be complex or less complex. Including more factors is always possible but rarely really necessary, the distribution will work very well even with a few factors.
I wrote a draw tool myself and tested it, after about 500.000 runs the distribution was already very good. There were only a few deviations. After a few million it would have been "fairly" distributed and I only used the standard RNG command which some programming languages already offer from the house. So these already serve their purpose very well and have a good algorithm.
But what I am missing in your claim is the proof, if you can statically prove that the lottery is outside its range then is justified. And yes you can calculate the distribution in the statistics and to what degree it is still coherent.
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Liked this post: Anonym, Anonym,
Delarion, 
Falko, 
Julian, 
palme7777, 
ruhrpott, 
snopsim
I've never seen so much ingratitude as here in this forum, there is no forum that makes sone lotteries and yet it always knows some people do not appreciate
Simply sad and that although supposedly the feast of love is approaching.
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Liked this post: Anonym,
Falko, 
Julian, 
Kleinkariert, 
palme7777, u****n
you argue with: "mir hupe ob ich win", "the system prefers names" and what I know for bullshit.
if you did not care, you would not write anything about it
if the system would prefer names the same would win as last year
haven't won yet, see me crying? you're just making a fool of yourself
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Liked this post: Anonym,
Delarion, 
Falko, 
Jenn-R, 
kersei, 
kyosuma, 
palme7777
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Liked this post: Anonym
But that's also just, dear robby, because you haven't yet sufficiently appreciated that extremely cute (nohomo) Christmas hat above the G at GambleJoe in the upper left corner
😎
But now without nonsense, I celebrate that somehow extremely haha 😂
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Liked this post: Anonym
Do I have to now on the silent staircase?
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Great thing about the advent calendar, but...
Liked this post: Anonym
yes but very quickly ! and before Christmas you will not get away from there, not that you dare to win again !!!!!
This post has been translated automatically