Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

BluVegas: Bluvegas payout cancelled 2500€ (Page 3)

Topic created on 05th Sep. 2023 | Page: 3 of 3 | Answers: 33 | Views: 2,336
Julian
Elite

Blubbo33 wrote on 07/09/2023 at 14:09:

The thread creator has also had no respect for gamblejoe with his not quite truths, should not be completely disregarded, I think to close the thing seems the right thing to do, since no more response is expected.


But of course understand what you mean !

It was already mentioned by a member, but purely theoretically it's about statement against statement.
There were some statements from the thread creator that do not quite match the information that I have been told at least, but since the thread creator is still of the opinion that the evidence from the Provider does not correspond to reality, I would like to try my best to handle the situation as neutrally as possible.

I would like to give the thread creator for a short time the chance to express himself in the thread, in my eyes it should be his right.
Provided that no further reaction comes in a timely manner, I will then temporarily close the thread.

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07
Expert

Julian wrote on 07/09/2023 at 14:25:

It's already been mentioned by one member, but in purely theoretical terms this is about testimony vs. testimony.
There were some statements from the thread creator that don't quite match the information I've been given at least, but since the thread creator still thinks that the evidence from the vendor doesn't match reality, I'd like to try my best to handle the situation as neutrally as possible.

I would like to give the thread creator for a short time the chance to express himself in the thread, in my eyes it should be his right.
Provided that no further reaction comes in a timely manner, I will then temporarily close the thread.

To keep it factual: Neither GJ nor other forums can help there, since from the player side proofs/evidence are missing. Personally, I see only one solution: contact the game Provider, explain the issue and ask for logs - if they give it out at all. There are simply no other possibilities. GJ can't do magic and you don't have the burden of proof - that's up to the player. I don't know if the MGA does that, but the provider is 100% the right address.

Find it but still fair from you that you still gives the user the opportunity to comment on it. Would be interesting to know what he has in mind - of course, assuming that he has not made a bonus buy.


This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Legend
frapi07 wrote on 07.09.2023 at 14:54:

To keep it factual: Neither GJ nor other forums can help there, as evidence/proof is missing from the player side. Personally, I see only one solution: contact the game Provider, explain the issue and ask for logs - if they give it out at all. There are simply no other possibilities. GJ can't do magic and you don't have the burden of proof - that's up to the player. I don't know if the MGA does that, but the provider is 100% the right address.

Find it but still fair from you that you still gives the user the opportunity to comment on it. Would be interesting to know what he has in mind - of course, assuming that he has not made a bonus buy.



The provider can also just say anything if no authority looks for it, but they will not stab their customers in the back for the player is just a number if they have any bock on the fun

This post has been translated automatically

Hidaruma
Top Member

gamble1 wrote on 08.09.2023 at 00:29 Clock:
The Provider can but also just say anything if no authority looks for it but they will not stab their customers in the back for the player is just a number if they have any bock on the fun

In the past, it has been shown again and again that many who cry "fraud" here, just talk garbage. This was shown again and again when a GJ mod commented on these cases. Will be no different here.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics10th May. 2024 at 07:27 am CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately