-
Dan__, today at 04:37 am CEST
-
Langhans_innen, yesterday at 09:12 pm CEST
-
Spielheld, on 8th May. 2025 at 10:47 pm CEST
-
Druff, on 8th May. 2025 at 07:15 pm CEST
-
Pneumatic, today at 08:21 am CEST
-
Rasmik12, today at 07:17 am CEST
-
ExCaL, today at 05:20 am CEST
-
Langhans_innen, today at 02:18 am CEST
-
Langhans_innen, today at 12:05 am CEST
-
sundance, yesterday at 10:51 pm CEST
-
frapi07, yesterday at 08:35 pm CEST
-
bruffl, yesterday at 08:12 pm CEST
-
fros7byte, yesterday at 06:32 pm CEST
-
DerLorax, yesterday at 06:04 pm CEST
-
frapi07, yesterday at 02:52 pm CEST
-
Donnie, yesterday at 11:28 am CEST
-
Olli_Eule, yesterday at 11:14 am CEST
-
Langhans_innen, yesterday at 10:56 am CEST
-
Bonusfan, yesterday at 10:48 am CEST
-
Labi95, yesterday at 09:21 am CEST
-
Viktoria671970, yesterday at 02:22 am CEST
-
Gamer, on 8th May. 2025 at 05:39 pm CEST
-
gamble1, on 8th May. 2025 at 01:22 pm CEST
-
Labi95, on 8th May. 2025 at 10:04 am CEST
-
Donnie, on 8th May. 2025 at 09:48 am CEST
-
x00NY, on 8th May. 2025 at 12:02 am CEST
Probabilities of slots 90-97% ? Poker 97-98% ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
after my bust at ThisIsVegas Casino (win not paid out) I tested some slot games and compared welcome offers and read many of your posts.
Briefly something about me. I come from the sports stock market and due to a difficult phase, I take distance for now and look at this topic more closely....
After my first experience at one of your 'favorites' Slotmillion.com and the free spins that pepushed me within 24h from 20€ to 240€ (steadily increasing) other reports of new customers in casinos came to my mind
(Played übriegends 'Chilli Heat')
With next logging in I have consciously further the lowest employment selected, since the Slot-Wahrscheinlicheit to 'hold' and/or small losses/wins to fetch is most realistichsten.
So it should be possible, in the worst case, still pay out a few euros.
I am of course aware that the spins are 'supposed' to be individual according to the manufacturer.
And of course my experience of approx. 2x 24h is not representative, nevertheless it is worth mentioning, if one rises 24h steadily and in the next 24h steadily falls until one is at 0
and this in connection with a new user who plays there for the first time, that is already remarkable
But now to a question that follows this quasi directly
How is it possible that (many) casinos give 100% turnover conditions on slots? And on live events, for example, only 10%-25%
The warscheinlickeiten are officially the same and factually the slots are even checked for their warscheinlickeit and are monitored by CPU's.
In Poker, you can act as a player, but before the flop is just betting and clairvoyance is known that no one can
It makes no sense to give a player 100-300% bonus on a slot, which makes (unmanipulated) 3% win...
... .Without a security to be able to bind the customer!
The way it went with me I would wish it as a manager...
And the question about the 10-25% to live events is also not clear to me. In poker, where it is about percentages after the flop, it certainly makes more sense than . z.b in roulette
If you want to discuss something like that, then probably here
This post has been translated automatically
Probabilities of slots 90-97% ? Poker 97-98% ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Probabilities of slots 90-97% ? Poker 97-98% ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Slot players have to bet less than live players and are supposed to turn over less???
I am a little shocked that no one is interested in this...
The fact is that this rule only makes sense if the slot for the casino (significantly) less risk means higher turnover and speed!
And that is only so if the slots are controlled. At 95% absolutely damaging to business to set such a condition.
Today I have played 4 different slot in test mode (200Spins) - all clear loss
This post has been translated automatically
Probabilities of slots 90-97% ? Poker 97-98% ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
But as you know, the (theoretical) house advantage on slots is also higher. Which is of course also an argument. In many casinos, slots with very high RTP (e.g. Blood Suckers) are also excluded from the bonus turnover or are only calculated proportionally
This post has been translated automatically
Probabilities of slots 90-97% ? Poker 97-98% ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Probabilities of slots 90-97% ? Poker 97-98% ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
So math doesn't seem to be your strong suit ......
Just the fact brought in by wettibernd that a slot game is 5-10 times faster than a live game destroys your statement.
It is also not about 1or2% as talk here about the 5-6Fachen turnover for (not controllable) live events!
This post has been translated automatically
Probabilities of slots 90-97% ? Poker 97-98% ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Nu, and by the fact that the slots run faster they bring in even more. I wonder which of us is making a mistake in thinking. 🤔
This post has been translated automatically
Probabilities of slots 90-97% ? Poker 97-98% ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Okay again very slowly. I think you do not understand the thought process...
Fact:
Slots
more revenue = more win
percentage regulated!
100% turnover condition
Live events - less turnover = less win
unregulated!
10-20% turnover condition
So and now explain to me who like that with the turnover conditions to explain would be!
In my opinion, there is only one explanation....
This post has been translated automatically
Probabilities of slots 90-97% ? Poker 97-98% ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Why should the chances of winning be 5-6 times higher than in slots ? Is it officially absolutely not it is almost the same!
From this it can be concluded that the information of the slot manufacturers can not be correct!
This post has been translated automatically
Probabilities of slots 90-97% ? Poker 97-98% ?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Because the profit expectation for the player at the table is theoretically higher. And thus the OC earns less. What is there not to understand? Why should the OC do it the other way around? To cut its own flesh? Furthermore, we have already established that the slots run faster and are played more
What would be your explanation?
This post has been translated automatically