-
Wochik, today at 12:16 am CEST
-
Langhans_innen, yesterday at 09:12 pm CEST
-
Spielheld, on 8th May. 2025 at 10:47 pm CEST
-
Druff, on 8th May. 2025 at 07:15 pm CEST
-
Langhans_innen, today at 12:05 am CEST
-
Inter010, yesterday at 11:28 pm CEST
-
MisterL, yesterday at 11:05 pm CEST
-
sundance, yesterday at 10:51 pm CEST
-
frapi07, yesterday at 08:35 pm CEST
-
bruffl, yesterday at 08:12 pm CEST
-
JJepsa96, yesterday at 07:53 pm CEST
-
fros7byte, yesterday at 06:32 pm CEST
-
DerLorax, yesterday at 06:04 pm CEST
-
frapi07, yesterday at 02:52 pm CEST
-
Donnie, yesterday at 11:28 am CEST
-
Olli_Eule, yesterday at 11:14 am CEST
-
Langhans_innen, yesterday at 10:56 am CEST
-
Bonusfan, yesterday at 10:48 am CEST
-
Labi95, yesterday at 09:21 am CEST
-
Viktoria671970, yesterday at 02:22 am CEST
-
Gamer, on 8th May. 2025 at 05:39 pm CEST
-
gamble1, on 8th May. 2025 at 01:22 pm CEST
-
Labi95, on 8th May. 2025 at 10:04 am CEST
-
Donnie, on 8th May. 2025 at 09:48 am CEST
-
x00NY, on 8th May. 2025 at 12:02 am CEST
-
Sanioli, on 7th May. 2025 at 11:40 pm CEST
Payout ratio at 95%
Nobody has liked this post so far
Who decides whether person x or y gets what and in what time.the program must have been written.sits somewhere "small Robbi" and says so player No 42000 gets 30% 10000 10% or how.
That I do not always at 1000 Deposit
95% is already clear to me.
At Gamble Joe I read something about AQ.95% that 96% that.If there is somewhere where I can read the exact would be nice.The Variance I have read answered but not my question.
About an answer I would be happy
This post has been translated automatically
Payout ratio at 95%
Nobody has liked this post so far
All players access a software program, the game.
This throws out a random result on each spin within a certain range, say from 0.2x bet to 5000x bet.
The game is programmed so that in the long run, with millions of spins made by all players together, the 95% AQ is reached.
Now which player wins and which loses should depend on chance, and is not decided by anyone.
To prevent the always same discussion: that's how it should be in theory, and no of course I can't judge whether the casinos are not colluding with the game manufacturers...;-)
https://www.gamblejoe.com/forum/online-casinos/allgemeines/wird-man-als-neuer-spieler-bevorzugt-34582/2/
Daniel has put a lot of links to the topic there...
This post has been translated automatically
Payout ratio at 95%
Nobody has liked this post so far
person 2 does that 1 time and gets the 10 million.That was now only theory.I'm just the desire to gamble gone
This post has been translated automatically
Payout ratio at 95%
Liked this post: Anonym
No.
To put it simply:
There is a Pot in which you reingreifst and pay each time 1 euro for it.
In this pot there are 10 lots.
5 of them are a loser, with 1 you get 50 cents, with 3 you get 2 euros and with one you get 3 euros.
Now you draw a lot and throw it back into the pot.
So there are always 10 tickets in it.
It is completely irrelevant for you how often another player draws the 3 Euro
Maybe another player draws the 3 Euro 10 times in a row. Then he has made plus.
Maybe you are unlucky and draw the loser 10 times in a row.
Although you both played with the same probabilities, your result is still different in the end
In the long run, however, the casino makes plus because in the pot is only a total value of 9.50, but the tickets together would cost 10 euros. This is then the bank advantage.
However, the previous event is independent of the next.
The tickets have no memory, so to speak.
The casino only makes a win because different players reach into the pot millions of times, and in the long run the majority of players lose 50 cents per 10 games.
It can be that one player is heavily in the plus, another is heavily in the minus and another is perhaps exactly balanced
So far understandable?
This post has been translated automatically
Payout ratio at 95%
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically