Why is that so ? Simply because a large market namely Germany is currently funny and the authorities currently exert more and more pressure on the casinos and even fines are put in the room
Through the MGA license and the seat on Malta are the rather tangible for the authorities and of course for all the back bookers with their lawyers as if they were not in the EU squat and I suspect this fact was also taken into account in the decision-making process
Thus the proceeding is actually at least from an entrepreneurial point of view quite logical and even sensible to be able to keep the business operation
Mallpall wrote on 27.09.2023 at 09:07: Was very happy on the pages on the road; contrary to popular belief in the forum, I have there but sometimes my fattest wins - which were also well paid - driven in.
And yes, I was also fleeced at the group times, but that was sometimes self-owned.
When I look at the new group and the conditions (max. payouts 10x the bonus) can only be bad - I think it's a shame.
I agree with that. My "favorite" casino group became uninteresting from one day to the next.
Gammix Limited company / casinos ( MGA) become Starscream Limited ( ??? )
27th Sep. 2023, at 10:38 am CEST#6
Nobody has liked this post so far
then you see it the same way as I do
and the others will follow little by little.
what gamble 1 has answered, is not so therefore fetched one could leave it also so stand only then I change nevertheless also only the seat and the name and otherwise nothing.all the more not that which the gammix G made out.
i have a completely different theory.