Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Deposit and withdrawal methods: Skrill claims money from 2020. (Sepa Collect) (Page 3)

Topic created on 02nd Aug. 2022 | Page: 3 of 3 | Answers: 21 | Views: 4,434
Crankyx3
Rookie
I refer to the court decision from 2020.
Link with advertising removed.

Whether my view towards the payment service Provider is morally reprehensible or not, everyone can decide for themselves.
Basically, it will most likely come down to the fact that I pay it, since it is a rather small sum.

Gambling debts are debts of honor, you can often tell the casinos. That the payment service provider must now suffer from it is of course a pity. But Skrill is also not a goodwill angel.

Nevertheless, thank you for all the answers.

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Legend

Crankyx3 wrote on 08/03/2022 at 10:40 am: I am referring to the court ruling from 2020.
Link with advertisement removed.

Whether my view towards the payment service Provider is morally reprehensible or not is for everyone to decide for themselves.
Basically, it will most likely come down to the fact that I pay it, since it is a rather small sum.

Gambling debts are debts of honor, you can often tell the casinos. That the payment service provider must now suffer from it is of course a pity. But Skrill is also not a goodwill angel.

Nevertheless, thank you for all the answers.

I have deliberately tried to leave the moral part aside and argue only purely with the facts


If you want to know my opinion I think the court decision won't help you because not the transaction to Skrill was illegal but only the further use

So I'm not even sure if you could theoretically get two on the roof on the one hand because of the legal payment you have to pay and on the other hand because of illegal gambling

Because a big difference to your case and most of the other cases is that they want money back that they lost and you will probably be accused of doing it on purpose

If you are now explicitly about your losses you are free to look for a lawyer to initiate proceedings but to start now with Skrill I think is very risky especially since the costs can quickly rise to over 1,000 if it goes badly

As I said is not meant badly but I know how fast that can go if you do not react and think oh they can me anyway nothing is usually a big fallacy

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics7th May. 2024 at 12:31 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately