Yes, I understood that the conditions are sometimes not very attractive, but that doesn't mean you have to kick people out immediately after a first small payout
that's why he wasn't kicked out. He was probably classified as a no depositor who didn't deposit. Most OCs would have simply turned off the no deposit. As I said, Pino is not such a good casino and you can see that in other places too. I gave an example with the wagerers for RAW depositors. Just because hardly anyone complains loudly doesn't mean they are good
frapi07 wrote on 01.06.2025 at 11:25:that's why he wasn't kicked out. They probably categorized him as a no deposo duster who doesn't deposit. Most OCs would have simply turned off the no depos. As I said, Pino is not such a good casino and you can see that in other places too. I gave an example with the wagerers for RAW depositors. Just because hardly anyone complains loudly doesn't mean they are good
Depositors were, including the 20 for the proof of payment, about 170 euros. I can hardly imagine that I was labeled a "no-deposit scammer" for this 😄
Hiring future No Deps would certainly have been the economically smarter solution for Pino.
I will never again make a succinct assumption that a casino is probably passable because I haven't heard any major complaints, because otherwise Frapi will keep feeding me his contrary opinion until I also admit that it's not good So at this point, I'll go on record with my revised statement: Pino isn't a blast and they also kicked out our X3 in a non-transparent way despite a 110€ loss, for which the store is now being finally beaten down here
Depositors were, including the 20 for the proof of payment, about 170 euros. The payout was then 60. I almost can't imagine that I was labeled a "No Dep dustman" for this
Hiring future No Deps would certainly have been the economically smarter solution for Pino.
What else could justify such a move? After a no Deposit has been successfully implemented and paid out...
Langhans_innen wrote on 01.06.2025 at 18:53: I will never again make a succinct assumption that a casino is probably passable because I haven't heard any major complaints, because otherwise Frapi will keep feeding me his contrary opinion until I also admit that it's no good So at this point my revised statement is highly official: Pino is not a banger and besides, they kicked out our X3 in a non-transparent way despite 110€ lousiness, for which the store is now finally being beaten down here
haha you're welcome to do that I'm not banning anyone ^^ But seriously, 10x on raw deposits is a crime. I don't care if they're that good otherwise. For players who prefer Live Casino really not a good place. Also, they may still have that 5.3% tax/spin (but I don't know for sure if they have it as I haven't played there for years). If they continue to deduct that, then it's also a reason to warn against them.
Langhans_innen wrote on 01.06.2025 at 18:53:they also threw out our X3 in an opaque way despite 110€ meager, for which the store is now finally being beaten down here
The first public reactions to a rather "uneconomical decision" were not long in coming...😄
The first public reactions to a rather "uneconomical decision" were not long in coming...😄
the end of the story: a lot of fuss about Tara and a completely battered reputation for Pino after years of managing to muddle through reputably. The deep fall of a casino.
Question about MiFinity: I wanted to Deposit money in the casino using vouchers. Now I am being asked what profession I have, income per year, expenditure in the casino per year, etc. Do you know it?
MiFinity payout
Nobody has liked this post so far
that's why he wasn't kicked out. He was probably classified as a no depositor who didn't deposit. Most OCs would have simply turned off the no deposit. As I said, Pino is not such a good casino and you can see that in other places too. I gave an example with the wagerers for RAW depositors. Just because hardly anyone complains loudly doesn't mean they are good
This post has been translated automatically
MiFinity payout
Liked this post:
frapi07,
Langhans_innen
Depositors were, including the 20 for the proof of payment, about 170 euros. I can hardly imagine that I was labeled a "no-deposit scammer" for this 😄
Hiring future No Deps would certainly have been the economically smarter solution for Pino.
This post has been translated automatically
MiFinity payout
Liked this post:
Druff,
frapi07,
Hanshanshans
This post has been translated automatically
MiFinity payout
Nobody has liked this post so far
What else could justify such a move? After a no Deposit has been successfully implemented and paid out...
haha you're welcome to do that I'm not banning anyone ^^ But seriously, 10x on raw deposits is a crime. I don't care if they're that good otherwise. For players who prefer Live Casino really not a good place. Also, they may still have that 5.3% tax/spin (but I don't know for sure if they have it as I haven't played there for years). If they continue to deduct that, then it's also a reason to warn against them.
This post has been translated automatically
MiFinity payout
Liked this post:
Langhans_innen,
Saphira
The first public reactions to a rather "uneconomical decision" were not long in coming...😄
This post has been translated automatically
MiFinity payout
Nobody has liked this post so far
the end of the story: a lot of fuss about Tara and a completely battered reputation for Pino after years of managing to muddle through reputably. The deep fall of a casino.
This post has been translated automatically
MiFinity payout
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically