I think so too. He may only pay the ace as 1, if he would have more than 21 otherwise
But I don't know which rule interpretations there are. In the various variants, the Dealer is often given advantages to cancel out the alleged advantages of the player.
Falcon wrote on 04/16/2021 at 10:26 am: It varies.
What you describe is also called soft 17. That means that even the Dealer still draws a card at 17 if there is an ace.
The rules are made by the casino, so it depends on which casino, Provider or Blackjack variant you play
So, completely normal what you have observed there.
No, at A, 2,4 the dealer does not draw a card anymore, because 17 is reached. (even if it is soft 17, the dealer does not draw more) The rules do not make each casino itself, but these are the Blackjack rules. (would be even nicer) Only with all the special variants of Evolution Gaming, the rules may be different. (these should not be played, however, because the payout ratio is significantly worse than in the normal variant) Just as sidebets destroy the payout ratio
Seniorfips wrote on 04/16/2021 at 11:58 AM
No at A, 2,4 the Dealer does not draw a card anymore because 17 is reached. (even if it's soft 17, the dealer doesn't draw anymore) Also, the rules are not made by each casino itself, but those are the Blackjack rules. (would be even nicer) Only with all the special variants of Evolution Gaming, the rules may be different. (these should not be played, however, because the payout ratio is significantly worse than in the normal variant) Just as sidebets destroy the payout ratio
Dude, can you please read properly before you write anything.
I wrote that there are variants where the dealer also draws at soft 17. And then you answer me with no and then write yourself that there are variants in which the dealer with soft 17 still draws.
Falcon wrote on 04/16/2021 at 12:05 PM
Dude, can you please read properly before you write anything.
I wrote that there are variants where the Dealer also pulls at soft 17. And then you answer me with no and then write yourself that there are variants where the dealer with soft 17 still pulls.
You write that each casino decides for itself which rules to play with in standard Blackjack, which is complete nonsense. So I would first learn to read yourself before you make others stupid.
Seniorfips wrote on 04/16/2021 at 12:11 PM
You write that each casino lays it out themselves with which rules to play standard Blackjack, which is complete bullshit. So I would first learn to read for yourself before you make others stupid.
Just do not upset me please
I wrote that it is different and thus confirmed the TE that it may well be that he played at a table with this rule.
Falcon wrote on 04/16/2021 at 12:15 PM
Just don't get me upset please
I wrote that it is different and thus confirmed to the TE that it may well be that he played at a table with this rule.
If this upsets you, you should seriously think about it. I have done nothing else, except to put a little thing right. As if that were now nen end of the world...
Black Jack Rules Interpretation
Nobody has liked this post so far
Suppose I have 18 in my hand (no matter how they are made up) and the Dealer already had an ASS and then draws another 2 and a 4...
Actually yes 17 and the rule says "stand at Seventeen"
Still, I'm sure I've seen in online Blackjack that the dealer then draws another card (or cards) because the counter jumps back to 7.
Is this correct or not?
VG
Yachtiooo
This post has been translated automatically
Black Jack Rules Interpretation
Liked this post:
Yachti
At least in the normal Blackjack variant, the dealer will not draw a card after that and will stop at 17
This post has been translated automatically
Black Jack Rules Interpretation
Nobody has liked this post so far
But I don't know which rule interpretations there are. In the various variants, the Dealer is often given advantages to cancel out the alleged advantages of the player.
This post has been translated automatically
Black Jack Rules Interpretation
Nobody has liked this post so far
What you describe is also called soft 17. This means that even the Dealer draws a card at 17 if there is an ace.
The rules are made by the casino, so it depends on which casino, Provider or Blackjack variant you play
So, completely normal what you have observed there.
This post has been translated automatically
Black Jack Rules Interpretation
Nobody has liked this post so far
No, at A, 2,4 the dealer does not draw a card anymore, because 17 is reached. (even if it is soft 17, the dealer does not draw more) The rules do not make each casino itself, but these are the Blackjack rules. (would be even nicer) Only with all the special variants of Evolution Gaming, the rules may be different. (these should not be played, however, because the payout ratio is significantly worse than in the normal variant) Just as sidebets destroy the payout ratio
This post has been translated automatically
Black Jack Rules Interpretation
Nobody has liked this post so far
Dude, can you please read properly before you write anything.
I wrote that there are variants where the dealer also draws at soft 17. And then you answer me with no and then write yourself that there are variants in which the dealer with soft 17 still draws.
This post has been translated automatically
Black Jack Rules Interpretation
Nobody has liked this post so far
You write that each casino decides for itself which rules to play with in standard Blackjack, which is complete nonsense. So I would first learn to read yourself before you make others stupid.
This post has been translated automatically
Black Jack Rules Interpretation
Nobody has liked this post so far
Just do not upset me please
I wrote that it is different and thus confirmed the TE that it may well be that he played at a table with this rule.
This post has been translated automatically
Black Jack Rules Interpretation
Nobody has liked this post so far
If this upsets you, you should seriously think about it. I have done nothing else, except to put a little thing right. As if that were now nen end of the world...
This post has been translated automatically
Black Jack Rules Interpretation
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically