Bonus & offers: Caution with bahigo (Page 2)

frapi07 wrote on 09.05.2025 21:55:

My post wasn't completely pointless. I wanted to point out that it is normal for a Provider to have different wagering criteria. At one provider I played at, the Bonuses were wagered as follows: slots 100% and Live Casino 10%, I forget the rest. There must be a reason why they do this. Mainly for security reasons.

This post has been translated automatically

Donnie wrote on 09.05.2025 at 23:02:
Thought about it again. This increases the turnover conditions more than the usual 3-fold, so the whole thing is no longer fair. Yes well, topic can actually be closed here, warning has arrived and can be left to Galileo Mystery😉

The conditions at Bahigo should be the same at German bookmakers and casinos, that would be fairer

This post has been translated automatically

Druff wrote on May 10th, 2025 at 10:40 am:
Gude like, and first sorry, was probably over it, but that's how it is when you get pulse, sorry 🙈


Regardless of whether the bonus is good or bad, I said nothing about that, of course there are worse ones, but I wanted to point out the conditions or the deception that goes with it (that's all it is!).

Even if the conditions are still within the normal range, in my opinion this is simply deception.

Of course they don't have their place of jurisdiction in Germany, that's their salvation, why don't such deceptive offers exist in Germany?

Ask McFit, they had a similar logic with the use of the turnstile/entrance (in the sense of logins), changed terms and conditions are accepted. Similarly with great special offers in supermarkets, why does the "best price" of the last 30 days have to be shown on the price tag?

Quite simply because there is no deception, which is why this exclusion of slots etc. and complicated bonus conditions is a thing of the past with DE breakage shops.

For example, StarGames and all the others have of course made the bonus conditions and the page layout etc. clearer for customer friendliness, they knew very well that the first one who complains against it will win without any problems 😅

I only mentioned StarGames because they also had these short term blockages, sometimes at short notice, without notice, to change a bonus that can only be wagered with real money, and not to mark these conditions clearly and immediately. 😅

To cut a long story short, the bonus may be good and acceptable, BUT the non-transparent conditions (which only apply to this bonus) are simply unfair and deceptive. (Of course only if the explanations are really as the TE presents them!)

Addendum: The creator wanted to warn about the conditions because he considers them unfair/deceptive, and in my opinion quite rightly so.

This post has been translated automatically