-
Patizi, on 15th May. 2024 at 06:37 am CEST
-
upola, on 30th Apr. 2024 at 08:14 am CEST
-
Schnorbi87, today at 06:48 am CEST
-
frapi07, today at 06:02 am CEST
-
Highroller97, today at 05:41 am CEST
-
Svenr, today at 02:20 am CEST
-
Olli_Eule, today at 12:56 am CEST
-
danny005, yesterday at 10:58 pm CEST
-
DerLorax, yesterday at 10:20 pm CEST
-
sigi36, yesterday at 08:05 pm CEST
-
slotliebe89, yesterday at 07:20 pm CEST
-
Comingsoon19, yesterday at 07:17 pm CEST
-
Pat1991, yesterday at 06:54 pm CEST
-
Shiningstar216, yesterday at 06:07 pm CEST
-
sundance, yesterday at 04:47 pm CEST
-
Cheeseburger, yesterday at 04:16 pm CEST
-
gamble1, yesterday at 02:50 pm CEST
-
frapi07, yesterday at 02:42 pm CEST
-
Donnie, yesterday at 09:33 am CEST
-
Max_Bet, yesterday at 09:20 am CEST
-
Max_Bet, yesterday at 09:17 am CEST
-
Tiro0815, on 17th May. 2024 at 08:18 pm CEST
-
Daniel1988, on 17th May. 2024 at 05:37 pm CEST
-
Jenges, on 17th May. 2024 at 03:41 pm CEST
-
WithoutWings, on 17th May. 2024 at 02:12 pm CEST
-
HerrNoob, on 17th May. 2024 at 01:38 pm CEST
What does "you are leaving Maltese legislation" mean?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Why do some games when I play them say "This game is operated under a Curacao license" or something like that, even though the site has a Malta license. I think it was an "Edict" game. Dragons-Treasure. These games are safe if the site has a Malta license right? So just saw this earlier briefly on Videoslots. I do not know the site well, but is recommended here yes. But of course I believe you that it is safe
Quasar sometimes says "You are leaving the MGA jurisdiction" or something like that. Are certain games on the same site more insecure? I think not, but I just want to understand
This post has been translated automatically
What does "you are leaving Maltese legislation" mean?
Nobody has liked this post so far
I only know why at sunmaker / sunnyplayer the Merkur games have a Curacao license, while at stake7 and Platincasino they are licensed in Malta.
With the above casinos, this has some political reasons, although I'm not so 100-percent see through, if I'm honest.
If you look at Stake7 and Platincasino (the casinos do not belong together) in the terms and conditions, then you will come across the following point:
This provision in the terms and conditions at Stake7 and Platincasino apparently comes from Gauselmann himself. He always defends his gaming arcades in public and says that with a ban, people will then use illegal casinos or migrate to the Internet, where you can lose much more, blablub. If it should come now times to inquiries, it would refer evenly to the AGB's with Stake7 and Platincasino and say that German players would be excluded. He would say that you can not control whether there are also German players play and so on ... (Polit-Kindergarten just)
In practice, of course, no players are excluded at the above casinos (because otherwise casinos that only offer Merkur games would be broke). In other countries, Merkur is unknown and the shoddily implemented online versions also create no incentive for said players. This clause has never been invoked in disputes. Even when it was about 160.000€, see: https://www.gamblejoe.com/news/merkur-casino-verweigert-auszahlung/
Sunmaker and Sunnyplayer used to have this provision in there as well. For whatever reason, they may delete this regulation if the games are licensed in Curacao.
That is all I can say on this subject. Maybe someone here knows more?
This post has been translated automatically
What does "you are leaving Maltese legislation" mean?
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically