In Germany there is freedom of contract, if it is not about real estate and work!
Even a "lending out of pocket" is a contract if it is agreed when the repayment takes place. Only if that is like in your case so that constantly amounts were borrowed from the pocket, then I would ask myself as a judge why? Is this true? And why you have not done something much earlier.
So it is testimony against testimony if there is no other evidence.
I think so: if you lend money to a gambling addict again and again over such a period of time, then you are to blame yourself
wettibernd wrote on 22/04/2019 at 22:14: In Germany there is freedom of contract, if it is not about real estate and work!
Even a "lending out of pocket" is a contract if it is agreed when the repayment is made. Only if that is like in your case so that constantly amounts were borrowed from the pocket, then I would ask myself as a judge why???? Is this true? And why you have not done something much earlier.
So it is testimony against testimony if there is no other evidence.
I think so: if you lend money to a gambling addict again and again over such a period of time, then you are to blame yourself
I'm sorry ---- but that's the way it is
Agree,
without witnesses or chat histories it won't work. Maybe turn on the recording on your cell phone, put it in your jacket pocket and confront him - maybe you'll get something out of him.
But since he has no money, it will be very difficult to get anything out of him. Lending such a large sum of money to a gambling addict was very naive and, objectively speaking, stupid
I stay with my max. 25 Euro with persons I know better and with max. 5 Euro with persons I don't know so well. Although this has also broken friendships, but I have saved me since I regulate the so many nerves.
Lend money to a gambling addict
Nobody has liked this post so far
Even a "lending out of pocket" is a contract if it is agreed when the repayment takes place. Only if that is like in your case so that constantly amounts were borrowed from the pocket, then I would ask myself as a judge why? Is this true? And why you have not done something much earlier.
So it is testimony against testimony if there is no other evidence.
I think so: if you lend money to a gambling addict again and again over such a period of time, then you are to blame yourself
I'm sorry ---- but that's the way it is
This post has been translated automatically
Lend money to a gambling addict
Nobody has liked this post so far
Agree,
without witnesses or chat histories it won't work. Maybe turn on the recording on your cell phone, put it in your jacket pocket and confront him - maybe you'll get something out of him.
But since he has no money, it will be very difficult to get anything out of him. Lending such a large sum of money to a gambling addict was very naive and, objectively speaking, stupid
I stay with my max. 25 Euro with persons I know better and with max. 5 Euro with persons I don't know so well. Although this has also broken friendships, but I have saved me since I regulate the so many nerves.
This post has been translated automatically