Druff wrote on May 21, 2025 at 12:58 pm:
No you got it wrong, for God's sake no name should be made public, no way....
But you could put it that way:
1. Scrooge McDuck holds xx coins worth xx €
2. Klaas Klever holds xx coins worth xx €
3. Gustav Gans holds xx coins worth xx €
Quasi anonymized, so publish unknown, it would be interesting to know how many coins the front runner has in the money bin 😅 Would be very interesting somehow 😜
But in any case, don't name the accounts, I completely agree with you, definitely not THAT 😁😅
I know he said it's a five-figure sum, but if there's 5k in leftover coins lying around now, for example, that puts the whole thing into perspective a little, it's basically just about having an idea ☝️😅
I think Gundel Gaukeley should not be missing from this amusing list. 😄
Otherwise, as Gambl1 already wrote, Matthias has published the top 10 coin millionaires. I think they will probably still be the same, because collectors and savers usually stay true to their habits.
I think Gundel Gaukeley should not be missing from this amusing listing. 😄
Otherwise, as Gambl1 already wrote, Matthias once published the top 10 coin millionaires. I think they will probably still be the same, because collectors and savers usually stick to their habits.
That's right, I'd forgotten about that one, so the Panzerknacker and Kater Karli should also be included 😁
Really that would have been published before? Then there's nothing wrong with doing it again haha since that was before my time (you could also say you were still in beutelhausen😅)
slotliebe89 wrote on 20.05.2025 at 20:58: I would be interested to know who is the biggest Dsgobert Duck among the users and has stored his GJ Coins and bathed in them.
Just to set the record straight:
It says "which" (which clearly refers to the user) and nothing about how much it is or anything like that. I don't think it was expressed incorrectly, as Druff would like to make it out to be.
My reaction to this was: " You can't be that curious that it's even somehow interesting what someone has in the way of valuables or money. I've never been interested in anything like that. It also has absolutely no positive effect for the people who know or the person it concerns. Apart from envy and resentment, it creates nothing.
It's really crazy that there are people who are interested in other people's money and valuables..."
Slotliebe responded with: "It's crazy, but I'm still interested. I'm also interested in what some top athletes earn. As long as it doesn't go hand in hand with envy or resentment, I don't see anything reprehensible about it. "
But then to respond to Druff's reaction with "Right, that's what I meant. " is taking the p**s. He even went into it quite clearly and mentioned that he was interested in what people earn.
It says "which" (Which clearly refers to the user) and nothing about how much that is or anything. I don't think it was expressed incorrectly, as Druff would like to make it out to be.
"Well, vlt that was unfortunate formulated with who "Scrooge McDuck" is, I could well imagine"
- - -
I'm not trying to put anything down, why should I? 🤦I wrote vlt and that I could well imagine...
How am I supposed to know how and what someone really meant, I can't look into their heads, can you ? That's why I was deliberately vague.
Druff wrote on 21.05.2025 at 20:45:
"Well well, vlt that was unfortunate formulated with who "Dagobert Duck" is, I could quite imagine"
- - -
I'm not trying to put anything down, why should I? 🤦I wrote vlt and that I could well imagine...
How am I supposed to know how and what someone really meant, I can't look into their heads, can you ? That's why I was deliberately vague.
But I can read. And if it's not even corrected when I ask, it's understandable how it's meant. And after a further response from me, nothing more was said. So there was another opportunity to correct it, which was not used. It's only after you've interpreted something and told him a story that he suddenly says he meant it differently. It's okay if he wants to know who earns and owns what, but I think it's weird.
But I can read. And if it is not even corrected when I ask, it is understandable how it is meant. And after another reaction from me, nothing more came of it. So there was another opportunity to correct it, which was not used. It's only after you've interpreted something and told him a story that he suddenly says he meant it differently. It's okay if he wants to know who earns and owns what, but I think it's weird.
I'm glad that many people have managed to read between the lines or have a good sense of what it was all about.
That says it all for me.
Tip of the day: Don't always see everything so doggedly...
I've been here for quite a long time, almost from the beginning, and I don't think anyone here has 5-digit coins.
I have won 1174 coins in the monthly raffles up to today (will be with interest).
I have won a total of 61.18 coins in the Christmas raffles (I just have no luck at Christmas).
And then I won another 28.00 coins in the surveys.
That makes a total of 1263.18 coins.
I donated 329.53 coins and exchanged the rest for credit cards, mainly Amazon.
My balance is now approx. 15.00 €.
I have nothing to hide but I am grateful to GJ that there is such a thing and if there are no more lotteries it is not bad I will continue to be a loyal user of this forum.
gagapapamama wrote on 21.05.2025 at 21:43: I've been here for a long time almost from the beginning and I don't think anyone here has 5 digit coins.
I have won 1174 coins in the monthly raffles in the time until today (will be with interest).
I have won a total of 61.18 coins in the Christmas raffles (I just have no luck at Christmas).
And then I won another 28.00 coins in the surveys.
That makes a total of 1263.18 coins.
I donated 329.53 coins and exchanged the rest for credit cards, mainly Amazon.
My balance is now approx. 15.00 €.
I have nothing to hide but I am grateful to GJ that there is such a thing and if there are no more lotteries it is not bad I will continue to be a loyal user of this forum.
I had a high 3 digit amount. I didn't write many reports and at the beginning I didn't take part in the monthly raffle. I've only been taking part for what feels like 3 years.
So it's possible that someone had a 5-digit amount ^^
frapi07 wrote on 21.05.2025 at 19:18: Can someone post the thread here? Can't find it^^ Dankö <3
I found something about it here, but not from Matthias. In any case, there was someone who had saved up almost 5000 euros in coins, if I understood correctly:
Saphira wrote on 21.05.2025 at 22:10:
I found something about it here, but not from Matthias. In any case, there was someone who had saved up almost 5000 euros in coins, if I understood correctly:
I also understood the post that way at the time, but now I think it's just the coins received or the value that was converted. Before that, Julian wrote that he actually had the high score because he had redeemed vouchers.
Only Julian can enlighten us
Edit: but I have to revise one statement. I don't think anyone had 5 digits either. 4 digits for sure^^
frapi07 wrote on 21.05.2025 at 22:27:
I had understood the post that way at the time, but now I think it's just the coins received or the value that was converted. Before that, Julian wrote that he had the high score because he had redeemed vouchers.
Only Julian can enlighten us
Edit: but I have to revise one statement. I don't think anyone had 5 digits either. 4 digits for sure^^
The 5 digits referred to the total amount of coins in the system. It says so in the initial post.
Incidentally, I don't find it at all reprehensible to be curious about who has accumulated so much. I find this reaction very human. When I read that, I also thought at first who it could be. It's just a spontaneous thought that pops into your head. Completely normal. That's why I read Slotliebe89's post in exactly the same way.
The 5-digit was related to the total amount of coins in the system. It says so in the initial post.
Incidentally, I don't find it at all reprehensible to be curious about who has accumulated so much. I find this reaction very human. When I read that, I also thought at first who it could be. It's just a spontaneous thought that pops into your head. Completely normal. That's why I read Slotliebe89's post in exactly the same way.
Yes, I know that. But my revised statement referred to my post where I replied to gagapapamama. He had written that he didn't believe that a single person had 5 digits. I can only agree with him ^^
It's a valid question in itself, but this comparison can spoil some of the fun. I mean, imagine someone has really made €10,000... then the joy of receiving the vouchers/codes can quickly evaporate ^^ It often happens with the monthly raffles... if someone is lucky enough to be drawn 8-10 times in 12 months, then you can feel the envy of the others in the posts - even though they have already won/received several hundred euros. It's not like that anymore, but a few months ago it was noticeable ^^
GambleJoe: An important note about our GJ Coins
Liked this post:
Max_Bet
I think Gundel Gaukeley should not be missing from this amusing list. 😄
Otherwise, as Gambl1 already wrote, Matthias has published the top 10 coin millionaires. I think they will probably still be the same, because collectors and savers usually stay true to their habits.
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: An important note about our GJ Coins
Nobody has liked this post so far
That's right, I'd forgotten about that one, so the Panzerknacker and Kater Karli should also be included 😁
Really that would have been published before? Then there's nothing wrong with doing it again haha since that was before my time (you could also say you were still in beutelhausen😅)
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: An important note about our GJ Coins
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: An important note about our GJ Coins
Nobody has liked this post so far
Just to set the record straight:
It says "which" (which clearly refers to the user) and nothing about how much it is or anything like that. I don't think it was expressed incorrectly, as Druff would like to make it out to be.
My reaction to this was: " You can't be that curious that it's even somehow interesting what someone has in the way of valuables or money. I've never been interested in anything like that. It also has absolutely no positive effect for the people who know or the person it concerns. Apart from envy and resentment, it creates nothing.
It's really crazy that there are people who are interested in other people's money and valuables..."
Slotliebe responded with: "It's crazy, but I'm still interested. I'm also interested in what some top athletes earn. As long as it doesn't go hand in hand with envy or resentment, I don't see anything reprehensible about it. "
But then to respond to Druff's reaction with "Right, that's what I meant. " is taking the p**s. He even went into it quite clearly and mentioned that he was interested in what people earn.
By the way, the answer is: money!
Edit by Julian: Font color has been adjusted
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: An important note about our GJ Coins
Nobody has liked this post so far
No idea why you seem to want to read more into this.
I already wrote in my 2nd post that GJ shouldn't do that at all. In other words, he should mention the user by name in this context.
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: An important note about our GJ Coins
Nobody has liked this post so far
"Well, vlt that was unfortunate formulated with who "Scrooge McDuck" is, I could well imagine"
- - -
I'm not trying to put anything down, why should I? 🤦I wrote vlt and that I could well imagine...
How am I supposed to know how and what someone really meant, I can't look into their heads, can you ? That's why I was deliberately vague.
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: An important note about our GJ Coins
Nobody has liked this post so far
But I can read. And if it's not even corrected when I ask, it's understandable how it's meant. And after a further response from me, nothing more was said. So there was another opportunity to correct it, which was not used. It's only after you've interpreted something and told him a story that he suddenly says he meant it differently. It's okay if he wants to know who earns and owns what, but I think it's weird.
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: An important note about our GJ Coins
Nobody has liked this post so far
I'm glad that many people have managed to read between the lines or have a good sense of what it was all about.
That says it all for me.
Tip of the day: Don't always see everything so doggedly...
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: An important note about our GJ Coins
Liked this post:
bruffl,
debbiedance91,
garfield68,
Saphira
I have won 1174 coins in the monthly raffles up to today (will be with interest).
I have won a total of 61.18 coins in the Christmas raffles (I just have no luck at Christmas).
And then I won another 28.00 coins in the surveys.
That makes a total of 1263.18 coins.
I donated 329.53 coins and exchanged the rest for credit cards, mainly Amazon.
My balance is now approx. 15.00 €.
I have nothing to hide but I am grateful to GJ that there is such a thing and if there are no more lotteries it is not bad I will continue to be a loyal user of this forum.
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: An important note about our GJ Coins
Nobody has liked this post so far
I had a high 3 digit amount. I didn't write many reports and at the beginning I didn't take part in the monthly raffle. I've only been taking part for what feels like 3 years.
So it's possible that someone had a 5-digit amount ^^
Edit: there was also a thread where you could tell how many coins you had already received. There were some who had 1000€+ How many GJ Coins have you already exchanged? | GambleJoe® Forum (page 1/4)
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: An important note about our GJ Coins
Liked this post:
frapi07
I found something about it here, but not from Matthias. In any case, there was someone who had saved up almost 5000 euros in coins, if I understood correctly:
https://www.gamblejoe.com/forum/sonstiges/smalltalk/wie-viele-gj-coins-habt-ihr-bereits-eingetauscht-409160/3/#p410195
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: An important note about our GJ Coins
Nobody has liked this post so far
I also understood the post that way at the time, but now I think it's just the coins received or the value that was converted. Before that, Julian wrote that he actually had the high score because he had redeemed vouchers.
Only Julian can enlighten us
Edit: but I have to revise one statement. I don't think anyone had 5 digits either. 4 digits for sure^^
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: An important note about our GJ Coins
Liked this post:
frapi07
The 5 digits referred to the total amount of coins in the system. It says so in the initial post.
Incidentally, I don't find it at all reprehensible to be curious about who has accumulated so much. I find this reaction very human. When I read that, I also thought at first who it could be. It's just a spontaneous thought that pops into your head. Completely normal. That's why I read Slotliebe89's post in exactly the same way.
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: An important note about our GJ Coins
Liked this post:
Saphira
Yes, I know that. But my revised statement referred to my post where I replied to gagapapamama. He had written that he didn't believe that a single person had 5 digits. I can only agree with him ^^
It's a valid question in itself, but this comparison can spoil some of the fun. I mean, imagine someone has really made €10,000... then the joy of receiving the vouchers/codes can quickly evaporate ^^ It often happens with the monthly raffles... if someone is lucky enough to be drawn 8-10 times in 12 months, then you can feel the envy of the others in the posts - even though they have already won/received several hundred euros. It's not like that anymore, but a few months ago it was noticeable ^^
This post has been translated automatically
GambleJoe: An important note about our GJ Coins
Nobody has liked this post so far
haha, ditto
This post has been translated automatically