Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Other topics related to... : Player Locking System OASIS Thread (Page 292)

Topic created on 10th Feb. 2022 | Page: 292 of 295 | Answers: 2,940 | Views: 679,475
Maria_Sonntag
Amateur
This period of 7 days or 4 weeks is new to me and is not specified in the law or anywhere else (except apparently by the RPDA itself), so I can't tell you why it takes so long. My answer referred to the statement that it would be a third-party block.

This post has been translated automatically

JJepsa96
Rookie

R3hab wrote on January 06, 2025 at 4:41 pm:

Why do I have to wait 1 month then, In the arcade where I asked is also the arcade which blocked me at my request at that time


So it was not a foreign ban but still have to wait a month
Very strange

So is it officially confirmed as a self-ban? Otherwise I would ask.

This post has been translated automatically

Fiete2000
I had now sent out another request by e-mail for a suspension.

Do you think it will be processed?

This post has been translated automatically

Baldhoeffentlich
Visitor
It's totally strange for me:

I had myself blocked for three months on 03.10.2024 via a provider's app with a self-block. Theoretically, I could apply to have the block lifted from 04.01.2025, which I did.
I was then informed that I could only unblock myself from 04.10.2025.
The mistake:
Instead of a self-block with a term of three months, the Provider transmitted a self-block to OASIS for an indefinite period, which then does not allow itself to be unblocked again for at least a year.
Now the authority, i.e. Oasis, does not want to unblock me and is demanding a justification and explanation from the provider as to why another incorrect block was transmitted.

Has anyone had such an experience?

This post has been translated automatically

Fiete2000
Today I submitted an application for revocation using the online procedure. How long will it take until the revocation?

Thanks in advance and best regards
Fiete

This post has been translated automatically

Pneumatic
Top Member

Fiete2000 wrote on 09.01.2025 at 16:08: I submitted an application for revocation using the online procedure today. How long does it take approximately until it is canceled?

Thanks in advance and best regards
Fiete

I made the revocation via BundID after about 1 hour I got the confirmation of the revocation by mail.


Revocation is effective from 13.01, application submitted on 06.01

This post has been translated automatically

Tragedie

Maria_Sonntag wrote on 06.01.2025 at 15:04:

That would indeed be something to ask Tipico about. As a rule, the Online Casinos block someone according to § 8a para. 1 GlüStV 2021 if they close their account because they have to assume that this is at Risk of Gambling addiction or over-indebtedness.

But that would then 1. be a third-party ban and 2. last at least 1 year. Tipico cannot do this "just like that".



I have received information from the regional council that they need proof from Tipico that I have not applied for a new self-ban. Then they would delete the block as an exception. I have written to Tipico several times but they simply don't reply at all. Not even any information. This means that any Provider can simply enter a self-block without any basis and you are powerless.

This post has been translated automatically

R3hab
Elite

JJepsa96 wrote on 07/01/2025 14:29:

So is it officially confirmed to be a self lock? Otherwise I would ask.

No, I'm not that interested now, it's just weird but well, that's the way it is then I just have to wait a month instead of a week 🥸

This post has been translated automatically

Maria_Sonntag
Amateur

Tragedie wrote on January 10th, 2025 at 7:03 pm:

I have received information from the regional council that they need proof from Tipico that I have not applied for a new self-exclusion. Then they would exceptionally delete the block. I have written to Tipico several times but they simply don't reply at all. Not even any information. This means that any Provider can simply enter a self-block without any basis and you are powerless.

It is somehow logical that the RPDA needs proof, otherwise everyone who has been blocked and no longer wants to be blocked would say that they were blocked without their knowledge and didn't want it.

Your last sentence can be applied to all of life: According to this, simply any provider can register without basis - an Insurance contract - a cell phone contract - a what do I know contract and you are powerless. Of course, you are not powerless, but in your case, you will probably only have legal recourse if the provider does not respond. But unfortunately I'm on the outside here.

This post has been translated automatically

Tragedie

Maria_Sonntag wrote on January 13th, 2025 at 10:32 am:

It's kind of logical that the RPDA needs proof, otherwise everyone who has been banned and no longer wants to be banned would say that they were banned without their knowledge and didn't want it.

Your last sentence can be applied to all of life: According to this, simply any Provider can register without basis - an Insurance contract - a cell phone contract - a what do I know contract and you are powerless. Of course, you are not powerless, but in your case, you will probably only have legal recourse if the provider does not respond. But unfortunately I'm on the outside here.

Well, in the case of a cell phone contract, I can clarify this directly with the provider. It takes criminal energy to simply enter a contract without my signature or to want to bill me. I can also use chargebacks. In this case, the provider has to prove that there is a legally valid contract.


In the case of Oasis, the RPDA apparently takes over everything without any checks. In this case, I have to act as an intermediary between the two parties who have entered or recorded incorrect data. I then have the burden of proof, which is almost impossible.

The system may work for the first block. But that's about it. I won't let myself be blocked again, although if it continues like this, Tipico will do it on its own account anyway. Who knows what will happen next.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics9th Feb. 2025 at 01:16 pm CET

Community Forum-Moderators

Members who assist the GJ team in moderating the forum.
Profile picture of AndreAndre
Profile picture of gamble1gamble1
Profile picture of Langhans_innenLanghans_innen
Profile picture of SaphiraSaphira
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2025 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately