Chris26 wrote on 05/05/2022 at 00:31
The source (thanks @Krabbenburger) on this even says that they are not allowed to pay out while the review is ongoing.
"In carrying out the CDD measures, customers may be allowed to continue using their gaming account while the licensee obtains any necessary information from the customer concerned. However, until such time as the licensee obtains the necessary information and documentation from the customer to meet its CDD obligations, the customer is not to be allowed to effect any withdrawals from the account independently of the amount involved. "
Yes but if the customer refuses no more check runs then this is simply failed and with which reason then the payment is refused ?
gamble1 wrote on 05.05.2022 at 00:48
Yes but if the customer refuses runs no more check then this is simply failed and with what justification is then the payout denied ?
presumably because then the suspicion of money laundering can not be ruled out....
Chris26 wrote on 05.05.2022 at 01:40
presumably because then the suspicion of money laundering can not be excluded....
Yes but the deposits they keep then there it can not be excluded theoretically if one thinks now times logically or not ? Then would have to be dissolved in the consequence of the entire business relationship and beautiful everything back to square one the customer gets all the money back and the casino also
Does that happen in practice ? Of course not likely because as good as everyone is in the red and the casino then yes the money would be missing so you just refuse the payout it can not be excluded but still you work with the I call it now times Risk money blithely further
If you look at it logically, it makes no sense or do you think seriously that they send everything to the authorities, including all the money that has flowed? The keep it certainly and if someone asks you have the evil evil customer yes blocked and fully intervened
That would be at least a very efficient strategy to maximize profits
Of course, this is all just theoretical I do not know how it actually runs but purely from a logical point of view, it is true what I say or not?
gamble1 wrote on 05.05.2022 at 02:43
Yes but the deposits they keep then there can it theoretically also not be excluded if one thinks now times logically or not ? Then would have to be dissolved but in the consequence of the entire business relationship and beautiful everything back to square one the customer gets all the money back and the casino also
Does that happen in practice ? Of course not likely because as good as everyone is in the red and the casino then yes the money would be missing so you just refuse the payout it can not be excluded but still you work with the I call it now times Risk money blithely further
If you look at it logically, it makes no sense or do you think seriously that they send everything to the authorities, including all the money that has flowed? The keep it certainly and if someone asks you have the evil evil customer yes blocked and fully intervened
That would be at least a very efficient strategy to maximize profits
Of course, this is all just theoretical I do not know how it actually runs but purely from a logical point of view it is true what I say or not ?
of course, yes... - but on the other hand it would be more profitable for them to let the customers continue to play with them... than to block them.
Chris26 wrote on 05/05/2022 at 02:58
of course, yes... - but on the other hand it would be more profitable for them to let the customers continue to play with them... than to block them.
Of course it would be but when you weigh up between getting hit on the roof by the authorities including high penalties and just blocking the customer and keeping the funds it should still be a rather advantageous situation for the casino
Therefore I think some stores (by far not all) have no interest at all to solve the check quickly and easily or how else can it be explained that these checks come even if you are in the plus or that of countless cards 60 pages transactions are required when you can easily prove the moment of receipt of the assets?
Today I had the fun of registering with Boombangvip, after I had read here in the forum, what they organize.
Made a mini Deposit of 30 euros, against my habit, with a 100% bonus via Skrill.
I played Extra Chilli, was able to wager the bonus and requested a withdrawal via Skrill.
Shortly after that I received an email saying that you had noticed that I had been very active lately and that I should prove my income.
You would have to require this for regulatory reasons.
Haha, you had landed on the right one.
I took a screenshot of the MGA bylaws regarding this that EveryMatrix had sent me, and sent a salted mail back.
I cancelled my withdrawal request and quickly gambled away my balance, closed my account.
I thought I couldn't do worse and worse than Platin and the Kannix group, but far from it.
The full SOW on a single deposit of 30 euros.
Oh yes, ganź forgotten: I should verify my Netellerkonto also, although I had deposited with Skrill.
Allowed myself the fun of signing up for Boombangvip today after reading here on the forum what they were hosting.
Made a mini Deposit of 30 euros, against my habit, with a 100% bonus via Skrill.
I played Extra Chilli, was able to wager the bonus and requested a withdrawal via Skrill.
Shortly after that I received an email saying that you had noticed that I had been very active lately and that I should prove my income.
You would have to require this for regulatory reasons.
Haha, you had landed on the right one.
I took a screenshot of the MGA bylaws regarding this that EveryMatrix had sent me, and sent a salted mail back.
I cancelled my withdrawal request and quickly gambled away my balance, closed my account.
I thought I couldn't do worse and worse than Platin and the Kannix group, but far from it.
The full SOW on a single deposit of 30 euros.
Oh yes, ganź forgotten: I should verify my Netellerkonto also, although I had deposited with Skrill.
Have a nice evening!
Lol then the store has also seen me for the last time have me there some time ago once registered and € 50 gambled if the but come directly with such an illogical nonsense at such mini amounts I have gambled there for the last time
This post has been translated automatically
B****e
verified
Forum posts:928The member deleted himself on06.02.2024
Proof of income
5th May. 2022, at 06:13 pm CEST#58
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Jubla2014 wrote on 05.05.2022 at 17:25: Servus!
Speaking of proof of income:
Allowed myself the fun of signing up for Boombangvip today after reading here on the forum what they were hosting.
Made a mini Deposit of 30 euros, against my habit, with a 100% bonus via Skrill.
I played Extra Chilli, was able to wager the bonus and requested a withdrawal via Skrill.
Shortly after that I received an email saying that you had noticed that I had been very active lately and that I should prove my income.
You would have to require this for regulatory reasons.
Haha, you had landed on the right one.
I took a screenshot of the MGA bylaws regarding this that EveryMatrix had sent me, and sent a salted mail back.
I cancelled my withdrawal request and quickly gambled away my balance, closed my account.
I thought I couldn't do worse and worse than Platin and the Kannix group, but far from it.
The full SOW on a single deposit of 30 euros.
Oh yes, ganź forgotten: I should verify my Netellerkonto also, although I had deposited with Skrill.
Have a nice evening!
Yes, yesterday I also closed my account there, they have done without complaint, well then just not there anymore
Allowed myself the fun of signing up for Boombangvip today after reading here on the forum what they were hosting.
Made a mini Deposit of 30 euros, against my habit, with a 100% bonus via Skrill.
I played Extra Chilli, was able to wager the bonus and requested a withdrawal via Skrill.
Shortly after that I received an email saying that you had noticed that I had been very active lately and that I should prove my income.
You would have to require this for regulatory reasons.
Haha, you had landed on the right one.
I took a screenshot of the MGA bylaws regarding this that EveryMatrix had sent me, and sent a salted mail back.
I cancelled my withdrawal request and quickly gambled away my balance, closed my account.
I thought I couldn't do worse and worse than Platin and Kannix Group, but far from it.
The full SOW on a single deposit of 30 euros.
Oh yes, ganź forgotten: I should verify my Netellerkonto also, although I had deposited with Skrill.
Have a nice evening!
is very familiar to me, the same full program demand with me because of a 20 € deposit with skrill. they can me times...
and especially if you have only 1x deposited or for weeks there was not active then such a mail " that you have noticed that I have been very active lately" haha... very funny.
Proof of income
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes but if the customer refuses no more check runs then this is simply failed and with which reason then the payment is refused ?
This post has been translated automatically
Proof of income
Nobody has liked this post so far
presumably because then the suspicion of money laundering can not be ruled out....
This post has been translated automatically
Proof of income
Liked this post:
CashOut, 
Falke
Yes but the deposits they keep then there it can not be excluded theoretically if one thinks now times logically or not ? Then would have to be dissolved in the consequence of the entire business relationship and beautiful everything back to square one the customer gets all the money back and the casino also
Does that happen in practice ? Of course not likely because as good as everyone is in the red and the casino then yes the money would be missing so you just refuse the payout it can not be excluded but still you work with the I call it now times Risk money blithely further
If you look at it logically, it makes no sense or do you think seriously that they send everything to the authorities, including all the money that has flowed? The keep it certainly and if someone asks you have the evil evil customer yes blocked and fully intervened
That would be at least a very efficient strategy to maximize profits
Of course, this is all just theoretical I do not know how it actually runs but purely from a logical point of view, it is true what I say or not?
This post has been translated automatically
Proof of income
Nobody has liked this post so far
of course, yes... - but on the other hand it would be more profitable for them to let the customers continue to play with them... than to block them.
This post has been translated automatically
Proof of income
Nobody has liked this post so far
Of course it would be but when you weigh up between getting hit on the roof by the authorities including high penalties and just blocking the customer and keeping the funds it should still be a rather advantageous situation for the casino
Therefore I think some stores (by far not all) have no interest at all to solve the check quickly and easily or how else can it be explained that these checks come even if you are in the plus or that of countless cards 60 pages transactions are required when you can easily prove the moment of receipt of the assets?
This post has been translated automatically
Proof of income
Liked this post:
CashOut, 
Donnie, 
garfield68, 
moody, 
Saphira
Speaking of proof of income:
Today I had the fun of registering with Boombangvip, after I had read here in the forum, what they organize.
Made a mini Deposit of 30 euros, against my habit, with a 100% bonus via Skrill.
I played Extra Chilli, was able to wager the bonus and requested a withdrawal via Skrill.
Shortly after that I received an email saying that you had noticed that I had been very active lately and that I should prove my income.
You would have to require this for regulatory reasons.
Haha, you had landed on the right one.
I took a screenshot of the MGA bylaws regarding this that EveryMatrix had sent me, and sent a salted mail back.
I cancelled my withdrawal request and quickly gambled away my balance, closed my account.
I thought I couldn't do worse and worse than Platin and the Kannix group, but far from it.
The full SOW on a single deposit of 30 euros.
Oh yes, ganź forgotten: I should verify my Netellerkonto also, although I had deposited with Skrill.
Have a nice evening!
This post has been translated automatically
Proof of income
Nobody has liked this post so far
Lol then the store has also seen me for the last time have me there some time ago once registered and € 50 gambled if the but come directly with such an illogical nonsense at such mini amounts I have gambled there for the last time
This post has been translated automatically
Proof of income
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes, yesterday I also closed my account there, they have done without complaint, well then just not there anymore
This post has been translated automatically
Proof of income
Liked this post:
Jubla2014
is very familiar to me, the same full program demand with me because of a 20 € deposit with skrill. they can me times...
This post has been translated automatically
Proof of income
Liked this post:
dersawen, 
Jubla2014, 
Saphira
This post has been translated automatically